Well Ed~ of course I must complain! I begin with the fact we are listening here to a walking corpse looking for her funeral procession to join! She can’t be long in awaiting! Now my complaining here will never reach a sincere howl because, to use the lady Springer’s own math against her: Out of ten thousand who DO read this, there’ll be around 68 who DO UNDERSTAND what they have read,; then about the same as the number of successful appeals as occur annually will actually stand up and spread the word!? The reason we are in such a tailspin is just because of this “sit on your tail as the rulers spin you around till you are dizzied beyond comprehension”! America gave up thinking just about the time I was born and has developed learned reactions to just about everything. It is incredibly easier to convince yourself Jefferson and company were full of BS or they would have had electric lights, because Men were really never intended to govern themselves. How much easier it is to just pretend and jabber about everything and leave decision making to those willing to occupy that uncomfortable “think” hot seat! Lindsey doubtless in most minds has said too much! Americans love ball-score level mentality discussion but start searching around for a TV to watch when you press them to discuss real issues! Is that why she did NOT begin by referring to the fact America became a ”by committee” dictatorship on March 27th, AD 1861! Oh hell, she couldn’t do that because she’d have to explain it and I have been at that chore for nearly 20 years with usually only a tone deaf choir to listen to me! As easy as I think that clarification can be done, the real problem there is that you first have to find someone capable of believing what they were never told in government 501(c)(3)’s and GI schools and as well capable of thought outside the pre-programmed PPBS box which would always appear to them to be a violation of that good ole “comfort zone”! Why didn’t she at least give a crack at explaining that with RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER it matters not whether any phony play-pretend “laws” are passed or not so why read a damn :bill? Why hear a bunch of cases in COMMERCIAL LAW” which has been predetermined by the Rulers who wrote that “law” without any input from anybody except the “EXECUTIVE DICTATORSHIP COMMITTEES”! I guess THAT would have gotten her poisoned or shot by next morning! Hell Ed! She could have AT LEAST mentioned the whole government has been CHANGED TO A NETWORK OF PRIVATE FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE THE CHANGEOVER FROM Jefferson’s ideas to the magnificence of being a ruler/subject system as Fascist Socialism! She didn’t have to add the straw that broke the camel’s back that we have been under UN rule since AD 1946 and it is officially an international PRIVATE CLUB in status under international law OR that the UN Club is run by financiers controlled by the “City of London” and Vatican City! On the other hand, when you think of it Ed, aren’t these things BASIC to getting the big picture? ~Hal~
--- On Fri, 7/17/09, Ed <[email protected]> wrote: From: Ed <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: INSUBORDINATION OF DUTY - GOOD READ To: Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 3:23 PM _filtered #yiv1883420619 { font-family:Calibri;} _filtered #yiv1883420619 { font-family:Tahoma;} _filtered #yiv1883420619 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} #yiv1883420619 P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE:12pt;MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;FONT-FAMILY:"Times New Roman", "serif";} #yiv1883420619 LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE:12pt;MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;FONT-FAMILY:"Times New Roman", "serif";} #yiv1883420619 DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE:12pt;MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;FONT-FAMILY:"Times New Roman", "serif";} #yiv1883420619 A:link { COLOR:blue;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;} #yiv1883420619 SPAN.MsoHyperlink { COLOR:blue;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;} #yiv1883420619 A:visited { COLOR:purple;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;} #yiv1883420619 SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { COLOR:purple;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;} #yiv1883420619 P { FONT-SIZE:12pt;MARGIN-LEFT:0in;MARGIN-RIGHT:0in;FONT-FAMILY:"Times New Roman", "serif";} #yiv1883420619 SPAN.EmailStyle18 { COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-FAMILY:"Calibri", "sans-serif";} #yiv1883420619 .MsoChpDefault { } #yiv1883420619 DIV.Section1 { } Subject: Fwd: INSUBORDINATION OF DUTY - GOOD READ Lindsey Springer here and I would just like to show each of you something you may not totally grasp regarding the words "the law" or who we have given charge to administer such an ambiguous phrase. Legislative branch or Congress is supposed to write all laws. Based upon the stimulus bills we know someone is writing something but those seated by each State in the House and Senate can be assured that no member of either House or Senate were able to read such proposals once or even grasp the thousand plus pages circulated for consideration. Most only had two to three days to read up before they cast their vote. In my own State of Oklahoma, Congressman Sullivan was so distraught over voting for something he did not nor could read, he started drinking again which eventually led him to Betty Ford. He is probably one of the more rare ones who was willing to admit his errors. Nonetheless, I can only imagine how many laws have been "voted" for by members of the House and Senate without most all of those members ever even looking at the legislation being voted on by them. Executive branch of Office of President and Vice President are supposed to enforce laws. Yet, the ticket to that office is a birth certificate which after testing and investigation proves to be more likely true than not true. With Mr. Obama we are not allowed to see the actual birth certificate at his own direction. We are given a copy of something but what that something is would never work for obtaining driver’s license, Social Security Card or number, or a passport. Yet, this same copy of something from somewhere unknown, has allowed Mr. Obama to become the chief over issuance of all Commercial Driver’s Licenses, Social Security (with their 700 member party in Arizona), travel abroad, and oh, lets not forget the Chief of the armed forces. He has decided, with the help of many, Government needs to own businesses that are failing. They spin this to say "taxpayers" are not "owners" but that was simple propaganda to evade that real substance which is that when you buy a car or borrow money from a bank you are buying from government or borrowing from government. So, we have laws written but not read, voted for but not considered. We have the most important law to be enforced for the executive branch (natural born) not only ignored, but actually conspired by numerous judges nation wide, State and Federal, all of which are licenced attorneys, including other attorneys, spending millions of dollars attempting to keep any evidence existing from being made public under the right Obama claims he has to keep that information secret. I personally do not have any problem with the secret except that accompanying maintaining of such secret is the fact he is not eligible for the office of President nor can anything he says or do become enforceable. And last, our founding fathers contemplated that if Congress ceased reading what they were voting on and if the office of President was occupied by someone not natural born, that the Judicial Branch would surely catch these errors and turn this runaway freight train onto a more steady course. There are reasons why the Supreme Court "reviews" cases and one of the criteria is when one group of Judges has rendered an interpretation of some law purportedly voted on by Congress, and signed into law by someone purported to be natural born, i.e. President, and that another group of Judges disagrees with, that the Supreme Court would review this division and settle the lower Court’s division once and for all. After all Federal Law is to mean the same everywhere it applies, correct? In 1865 the Supreme Court reviewed 450 plus cases and in 2007, the Supreme Court reviewed 68 cases. The Supreme Court today is only about collecting filing fees. They have over 10,000 applicants apply at an annual income 10,000 times $300.00 equals $3,000,000.00. I am certain there are more revenue streams than filing fees but you can see that if only 68 cases are chosen to address out of 10,000, the odds the issues in your case will be addressed by the Supreme Court are almost impossible. If each appeal cost the average person $ 100,000.00 to produce (because of lawyering) then you can see the Supreme Court is misleading many to hope they will do what their rules say they will do while at the same time the Supreme Court refuses to go by their own rules. As you can see appeals to the Supreme Court is a hundreds of billion dollar a year business for lawyers. Even if your case is chosen, the chance the issue you raised will be settled after the Supreme Court gets through with their voo-doo is unlikely. Lawyers today have found a way to make what ever the Supreme Court says specifically not to apply anywhere else. In fact, Supreme Court Justices, who also are lawyers, appear to write what they do write to cause the need for lawyers to be in the everyday lives of Americans and not to prevent such a need. You should become aware of the "clerk pool" and no it is not a swimming pool for clerks. It is a group of people unknown to the public that are themselves each members of a Union and they are distributed the 10,000 cases a year the Supreme Court Clerk dockets, probably around 35 persons or so. The average intake is about 175 cases per week. This would then distribute 5 cases per week to each of the Clerks in the pool. Each Clerk then would be able to deal with one docketed case a day or in any 8 hour period. The Clerks each write a "memo" explaining what the "central issue" is in the docketed Petition and this "memo" is distributed to the justices. It is not the Petition filed by the complaining party that persuades the justice to vote to hear or not hear a certain case, but rather, it is the "memo" that crosses the eyes of the justices at the Supreme Court. It is widely reported that Justice Stevens does not use the memos and it appears Alito at present does not use the Clerk pool for anything. Seven Justices however do use the Clerk pool. Congress is supposed to write laws and they neither write them or read them. They just vote on sound bites given to the public. Presidents are supposed to be natural born, by clear and convincing evidence, yet there is not a single State that requires proof of such born status. Judges are supposed to read what is presented before them and pass on such issues yet they have become dependent on Clerks for almost every aspect of the Judicial function. In fact, Clerks are holding the rights of people to Judicial access, in my humble opinion, hostage. It is no wonder this place purportedly inspired by God is in the final stages of self destruction. People in Washington employed in the Congress, the White House, and the building with "equal justice" as a solemn promise, are refusing to do what the Constitution created their offices to accomplish. Is something so dysfunctional worthy of having the power to make the failure to act or act of doing nothing a crime against the power enumerated to them? It started with the draft and expanded into providing information at the request of any agency. In 1933 Congress used the threat of omission being a crime against the laws of the United State to convince people lawfully in possession of gold that if they did not exchange their gold for worthless Federal Reserve Notes that they would be considered an enemy of the United States and put in the penitentiary. Now, you and I are asked to allow Congress to make it a crime if you refuse to sign a contract for insurance of one kind or another. When it involved driving a car, you simply did not have to drive. No insurance no driving. If you got caught driving without insurance you were fined. With health insurance what will be the trigger? As long as you are not breathing you are not threatening interstate channels of commerce by your not having signed a contract for health insurance? If some of you are going crazy I can understand why. You allowed a United States Government to get too big and without checks and balances. I know, they have checks because they keep writing them and everything balances out because they do not use any particular scale anymore. That is not what checks and balances was intended to mean. If you wish after reading this to make a difference today then I suggest you start by writing your Congressman and asking him to help you understand where in the Constitution Congress received the power to make doing nothing a crime of doing something. You can use the draft, agency request for information, failure to turn in gold in 1933, and the willful failure to sign a contract for insurance as examples. In addition, ask how can "nothing done" be considered to have been done across some State line when the theory of omission is nothing was done at anytime and anywhere. The words lawyers use here is "having had an affect on interstate commerce." Just because Congress, the Office of President and the Judges and Lawyer are refusing to support and defend the Constitution does not mean you should follow the same. I leave you with the 2nd Amendment and your right to possess a firearm free of regulation from anyone to defend your home. The Supreme Court said Congress does not have the power to regulate firearms when the purpose is to defend yourself at your home. Imagine the couple in Florida who recently were killed by the military style invasion. Recently Judge Easterbrook and others have written in Circuit opinions the 2nd Amendment does not prohibit States from prohibiting firearm possession to defend yourself at your home. That the 2nd Amendment only applied to the United States. He knew that was not true. He said it because if any Judge writes in opposition to the words in the Constitution they will be labeled treasonist and demand for their resignation will be overwhelming. If they intentionally go against the Supreme Court, reprimand would be in order. So those who have treason in their blood but wish to keep their day job must accomplish the treason without being so obvious. Easterbrook was fully aware of the 9th and 10th Amendments. He knew States did not have the power to regulate possession of a firearm to defend yourself where you sleep at night because the "people" reserved this power to themselves. He simply disagreed with the Supreme Court’s Heller decision and this was his way of doing something about it. It must be sad to be stuck as a mere 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge with no where else to conquer but yourself. Maybe someday Judges will have to live in the place their opinions are sought to apply. Only in a place governed by a Constitution could the limited Government maintain claiming their enumerated powers while completely ignoring the fact that the rest of the power was retained by the people or the States if the people allowed it. I wonder what the crime would be if a person taking the oath of President was not truly a natural born. Maybe we should rewrite the oath to include the person swear he is natural born so that in the future consequence will attach to false oaths. Maybe we should write a law that requires all persons voting for a law to certify they read the law prior to such casting of such vote: By my vote here today given this ___ day of ______, 2009, I do hereby certify that prior to such vote I read each and every word presented therein in at least one time completely and can be held responsible as if the words in such law are my words set forth word for word. We could have another law that reads: If at anytime it becomes of record that any person casting a vote for any law passed by Congress certified they had read such law prior to casting such vote for same, and when such record indicates no such actual reading occurred or was even possible, the entire law shall be null and void for all purposes. Another law could say this: If it becomes of record any such member of Congress who cast any vote for any law is known not to have read and studied such proposed law, prior to casting such vote, such member of Congress shall be fined $ 10,000 in the first instance, and for each additional instance shall be fined $ 10,000 up to and including in total the amount of such member of Congress’ yearly salary. At such time as the amount of fines has exceeded the yearly salary of said member of Congress then, and only then, shall such member not be allowed to cast any vote for the remaining time left in the year’s term. The term shall begin on January 3 of each year and continue through January 2, of the next year. These kind of law are what people enact when their will has been usurped by those they trusted and paid to represent them. I continue to hope each of you plan on throwing out of office every house member and the 1/3 of the Senate at the next election cycle. For those of you contemplating keeping the status quo I would simply ask you why would keeping the unknown from those you thought you knew be better than replacing each of them with someone you knew very little about? Imagine how many lawyers, clerks and assistants, would each be labeled "fired" while the next generation of representatives could clean both houses up and give both houses back to the people of every State suffering currently. If you think it is too late then please delete my email. 7-16-09 Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.374 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2209 - Release Date: 06/29/09 14:43:00 ____________________________________________________________ Criminal Justice Schools Earn Your AA, BS, or MS in Criminal Justice At U Of Phoenix. Learn How
