Then do Matthew 13:15; are these upon us? This seems a good time to look at our divisions! Installment "A": (Two pages)
Mass Merchandising – the May-Day Pole I have observed three separate groupings of people within which fall almost the entirety of the American population. The first is composed of individuals who have amassed themselves into a sum; principally by attitude. One may in this regard it as a reality that most people will be so grouped and whereas that is principally so, this group is quite certainly made up of those who could – and often seem to be – of varied abilities and ethnic backgrounds. Their great joinder however is their great weaknesses rather than their strengths. This is seen both when they are left free and when they are by whatever means herded. They have a great breaking point they share which is that they greatly disfavor constant independent thinking and although many seem to be actually headstrong and independent, they all resort to imagination when confronted with one or another very confining or troublesome situations. Let us here observe a great divide between imagination and creativity. Imagination is when we are carried into the unknown while attempting to relate it to what is already, to some degree or another, related to experience and understanding. Imagination is really believing enough to attempt a blind move, to give one more pull on the handle to hit the jackpot, when experience and understanding tell you the odds are against it. Imagination, therefore, when attempting a known and desired end, is at best a last resort. So why is it that so many Americans are willing to be persuaded to “throw in the towel” on reason long before they see all the thinking they are capable of, played out? Additionally why is this fatality so often seen in herd instinct or mere rote learned reactions in some mass? A prime example of this is when masses believe some report of “news” from people they either know – or should recognize – to be irregular or part of some organization dedicated to profit first who are found guilty of conjuring from their imaginations if it seems advantageous to their own ends? This example may be repeated a thousand time in the daily lives of so many Americans from private romances to food purchases, the Mass Media is chosen because it involves such great numbers and such great acquiescence to accept uncertainty and one-size-fits-all thinking. Put this classification of a public sector together with that found by the “great classical socialistic thinkers” which they have deemed best-to-necessary for the success of any socialistic system! Creativity, on the other hand, is thoughtful use of fact. Of the two smaller groups comprising American society today we observe there are those who feel, and again more often than not from some inner drive not necessarily connected with reality, that they are among a select group fated to dominate in the ability to guide or control their fellow Man! We find these are the primary movers of the phenomena described as “Mass Merchandising”. Here we find a rather large contingent of “control freaks”. These are found either as discontents with the rung on the ladder they are at or up among the upper echelons doing their best to successfully “play the game” or supporting with crushing allegiance those with whom they feel they are “in command” of the alien masses “beneath them”! Seldom are these found to be associating on anything like a regular basis with the “less well endowed”! Some of these have indeed developed considerable intellectual talents but as a whole it is merely a closely knit fabric of like minds which qualify them to any altitude they wish to achieve. Their confines are actually a semi-permeable membrane through which we see a continuum of passers both in and out. Few of the outgoing are volunteers, and many find a stunted lifestyle on the “outside” with many finding existence itself stunted! “Ruthless” is a pronounced descriptive adjective of many if not most of this group; the kinder being “unyielding”! Never was this group as commanding as since the advent of “Mass Merchandising”! The second group is actually smallest, not the third group. A factor which might make the third seem smallest is that they are largely found sharing the fate of the majority of the first group. Another factor in this make-up is the fact there are many would-be second groupies and would-be escapees from the first group who are intermixed, Of course this group is turf for those who are confused or undecided as to where they really wish to be or should be. This is actually the most difficult of the three groups in which to stay the course for it means the hatred and utter disregard of the second must be overcome as well as the much mixed reception received out of the first! It as well is where thought prevails and true faith may be found. Of course the faith is almost exclusively in Christ Jesus and that based upon the least emotion and the bulk in reason, reality, and endurance. A real difficulty is the amount within of charlatans and pretenders providing drawbacks from other groups. Pretense is forbidden “fruit” in both that predominant Faith as well as the overall mind-set. The first group therefore is where the bulk is found both of the rather small group of “Jewish” followers and those of the Holy Roman Empire in America – which of course is not nearly so small. These two are found trying to break into the third group but due to the high degree of pretense involved in their lives they are usually not comfortable and are at odds with the principles involved. It is well known neither follower of the above have understanding at depth any of the doctrines they truly lie beneath or with the organization of their leadership (which fit nicely into the second group). The actual underlying principles of their “belief” lie well beyond their limited parameters of learning. This is not to say these are beyond pretense to know, because the lowest echelons of their leadership have given them a measured dose they were taught to pass down as sufficient, upon which these “believers” base knowledge. The dogma of these, following Mystery Babylon, discourages depth of knowledge among followers and most certainly has always taken great pains to forbid public awareness of it. As result, these are steeped in deep pretense! The precepts of the third group forbid repeating pretense except for speculation and fancy so it is understandable that a certain intolerance between the third and the others is to be anticipated. As a classic example, liawyers – especially attourneys – have little if any place in the third group. Lies and deceit are the worst and highest forms of pretense. Deceit demands a certain input of the clandestine and the modus operindi of the entire Babylonian -- or socialist -- system which we disenjoy today as operated at street level by the liawyer corps, demands the incessant input of the clandestine. Of all the American presidents and play-pretend presidents since Andrew Jackson, the only one to openly warn against this and actually attempt to do something about it was John F. Kennedy whose entire family except for one brother, was a vital part of the second group! Coming up: Part “B” describes the clear parts these 3 groups have played and still play in the current counter-revolution seen coming to a tumultuous head in its attempted destruction of the united States of America, such in play twice the time span real freedom took place in them. It will solve the question of Mass Merchandising in this and concern over its continuance in any potential successful DEFENSE! Next up! ~Hal~ --- On Tue, 9/1/09, stalwart1776 <[email protected]> wrote: From: stalwart1776 <[email protected]> Subject: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] And the buried this scumbag in Arlington National Cemetary To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 9:08 PM TED KENNEDY: PEDOPHILE-PROTECTOR OF THE SENATE By Rev. Ted Pike Few Americans realize that Sen. Edward Kennedy, "lion of the Senate," was also advocate for the hidden yet powerful pedophile lobby in Washington. During a previous intense fight to kill the federal hate crimes bill, a unique window opened to me and I saw Kennedy's pro-pedophile agenda in action. It was fall 2005. The hate bill had passed overwhelmingly in the House in 45 minutes, with no Republican opposition. It had been attached to the Children's Safety Act (CSA). CSA was must-pass legislation that would heighten penalties and restrictions on pedophiles. The Senate Judiciary Committee, headed by pro-hate bill Republican Arlen Specter, was overwhelmingly Democrat and supported hate crimes legislation. Kennedy's hate bill was sure to sail through Judiciary and the Senate (which in the previous Congress had passed the hate bill 65-33). At last, after seven years of frustration, the Anti-Defamation League, architect of the bill, was absolutely certain of victory. But then the playboy who panicked at Chappaquiddick again did the unexpected. Kennedy made an astonishing proposal to Senate Judiciary Republicans. It was related to me on terms of anonymity by a Senate Judiciary lawyer working for a prominent Republican senator. Sen. Frist's office subsequently confirmed to me that everything he said was true. Kennedy told Judiciary Republicans that his pedophile backers found intolerable the restrictions, penalties and humiliations imposed by CSA. If Kennedy would instruct his fellow Senate Judiciary Democrats not to move the hate bill forward to a Senate vote, would the Republicans join with the Democrats to water down the Children's Safety Act? This proposal was offered to the Republicans with the understanding that later, when CSA came forward to floor action in the Senate, Kennedy would exercise his option to attempt to attach the hate bill to the weakened CSA; he could call for a vote that would surely succeed. Judiciary Republicans recognized an incredible chance to delay hate bill passage. They worked with the Democrats to weaken some anti-pedophile penalties in the CSA. The Senate version ended up drastically shortened. Then for six months spanning two sessions of Congress, an unrecognized, unrecorded battle of Senate titans ensued. Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist knew that if he allowed CSA onto the Senate floor, Kennedy would instantly demand a vote attaching the hate bill to it. Into April 2006, Frist doggedly refused to allow CSA to be brought to floor action. Militant proponents of CSA, anxiously awaiting the protection it would afford America's children, were baffled at Frist's seeming inaction. Kathy Lee Gifford, John Walsh of America's Most Wanted and Bill O'Reilly heightened criticism of Frist's "procrastination. " They didn't realize he was heroically battling to keep Kennedy at bay, depriving him of the opportunity to pass the hate bill. Finally on Tuesday April 25, as national concern and impatience approached the breaking point, I sent out an e-alert explaining to the public the underlying dynamics blocking passage of CSA. During the next two days, O'Reilly became electrified with anger. He called Frist, confirming that Kennedy and his hate bill were indeed holding CSA hostage. Frist encouraged him to mount massive protest against Kennedy. On Thursday April 27, an enraged O'Reilly and Walsh tore into Kennedy through TV and internet. On "The O'Reilly Factor," they excoriated him for holding up legislation urgently needed to protect American children from pedophiles—all for the sake of his cherished hate bill! During the next two days, Kennedy's office was overwhelmed with 12,000 calls from outraged Americans. On Friday, Kennedy announced abandonment of any attempt to attach a hate bill to the CSA. The hate bill had again miraculously been defeated. Yet few knew, or know today, how much Senate Republicans had to maneuver and compromise in order to defeat it. Because of Kennedy, the pedophile lobby got what it wanted: a Children's Protection Act significantly less restrictive of pedophiles than in its original form. All week, Sen. Kennedy has been posthumously lauded for his part in the "Kennedy legacy" of passing an unprecedented amount of liberal legislation. But will his biographers or future generations have the courage to include within that legacy the truth about his protection of pedophiles and corresponding weakening of protection for their prey--America' s children? His cold decision to protect pedophiles over America's children was the work of a scumbag. __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Recent Activity 4 New Members Visit Your Group Give Back Yahoo! for Good Get inspired by a good cause. Y! Toolbar Get it Free! easy 1-click access to your groups. Yahoo! Groups Start a group in 3 easy steps. Connect with others. . __,_._,___
