Thanks Ed~ This is a very factual rundown on the rundown of America by "incorporation"! I will circulate it. However, and I guess you can just classify me the eternal Watchbird from now on, but I will strike the ending which pushes socialism. To me this seems like a socialist using truth to demise the other side when in fact they would deny the same truth if it worked against them!
To add to that, I will remind this whole piece is anti-corporation -- a fact just great with me --and that means anti-fascism -- again just great with me! It leaves me suspect however, that someone then pushes communism in the shadow of the evil of corporatism! I know you know, democracy is the backbone of communism! Nimrod gave us socialism and it hasn't improved one damn bit since then! ~Hal~ --- On Wed, 9/9/09, Ed Fyffe <[email protected]> wrote: From: Ed Fyffe <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Hidden History of Corporations To: "hal" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 6:47 PM Hal, All documents that I send will always be in Microsoft Works 8 format. I think you can get a free copy of the program off the internet. I have copied and pasted the attachment it in this email below --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/history_corporations_us.html Our Hidden History of Corporations in the United States First published February, 2000  When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country's founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society. Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these: * Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws. * Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose. * Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose. * Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm. * Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job. * Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making. For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow. States also limited corporate charters to a set number of years. Unless a legislature renewed an expiring charter, the corporation was dissolved and its assets were divided among shareholders. Citizen authority clauses limited capitalization, debts, land holdings, and sometimes, even profits. They required a company's accounting books to be turned over to a legislature upon request. The power of large shareholders was limited by scaled voting, so that large and small investors had equal voting rights. Interlocking directorates were outlawed. Shareholders had the right to remove directors at will. In Europe, charters protected directors and stockholders from liability for debts and harms caused by their corporations. American legislators explicitly rejected this corporate shield. The penalty for abuse or misuse of the charter was not a plea bargain and a fine, but dissolution of the corporation. In 1819 the U.S. Supreme Court tried to strip states of this sovereign right by overruling a lower court's decision that allowed New Hampshire to revoke a charter granted to Dartmouth College by King George III. The Court claimed that since the charter contained no revocation clause, it could not be withdrawn. The Supreme Court's attack on state sovereignty outraged citizens. Laws were written or re-written and new state constitutional amendments passed to circumvent the Dartmouth ruling. Over several decades starting in 1844, nineteen states amended their constitutions to make corporate charters subject to alteration or revocation by their legislatures. As late as 1855 it seemed that the Supreme Court had gotten the people's message when in Dodge v. Woolsey it reaffirmed state's powers over "artificial bodies." But the men running corporations pressed on. Contests over charter were battles to control labor, resources, community rights, and political sovereignty. More and more frequently, corporations were abusing their charters to become conglomerates and trusts. They converted the nation's resources and treasures into private fortunes, creating factory systems and company towns. Political power began flowing to absentee owners, rather than community-rooted enterprises. The industrial age forced a nation of farmers to become wage earners, and they became fearful of unemployment--a new fear that corporations quickly learned to exploit. Company towns arose. and blacklists of labor organizers and workers who spoke up for their rights became common. When workers began to organize, industrialists and bankers hired private armies to keep them in line. They bought newspapers to paint businessmen as heroes and shape public opinion. Corporations bought state legislators, then announced legislators were corrupt and said that they used too much of the public's resources to scrutinize every charter application and corporate operation. Government spending during the Civil War brought these corporations fantastic wealth. Corporate executives paid "borers" to infest Congress and state capitals, bribing elected and appointed officials alike. They pried loose an avalanche of government financial largesse. During this time, legislators were persuaded to give corporations limited liability, decreased citizen authority over them, and extended durations of charters. Attempts were made to keep strong charter laws in place, but with the courts applying legal doctrines that made protection of corporations and corporate property the center of constitutional law, citizen sovereignty was undermined. As corporations grew stronger, government and the courts became easier prey. They freely reinterpreted the U.S. Constitution and transformed common law doctrines. One of the most severe blows to citizen authority arose out of the 1886 Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. Though the court did not make a ruling on the question of "corporate personhood," thanks to misleading notes of a clerk, the decision subsequently was used as precedent to hold that a corporation was a "natural person." >From that point on, the 14th Amendment, enacted to protect rights of freed >slaves, was used routinely to grant corporations constitutional "personhood." >Justices have since struck down hundreds of local, state and federal laws >enacted to protect people from corporate harm based on this illegitimate >premise. Armed with these "rights," corporations increased control over >resources, jobs, commerce, politicians, even judges and the law. A United States Congressional committee concluded in 1941, "The principal instrument of the concentration of economic power and wealth has been the corporate charter with unlimited power...." Many U.S.-based corporations are now transnational, but the corrupted charter remains the legal basis for their existence. At ReclaimDemocracy.org, we believe citizens can reassert the convictions of our nation's founders who struggled successfully to free us from corporate rule in the past. These changes must occur at the most fundamental level -- the U.S. Constitution. Thanks to our friends at the Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy (POCLAD) for their permission to use excerpts of their research for this article. Please visit our Corporate Personhood page for a huge library of articles exploring this topic more deeply. You might also be interested to read our proposed Constitutional Amendments to revoke illegitimate corporate power, erode the power of money over elections, and establish an affirmative constitutional right to vote. From: hal <[email protected]> To: Ed Fyffe <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 10:54:00 PM Subject: Re: Hidden History of Corporations ed~ unable to open;what is a WPS file? ~Hal~ --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Ed Fyffe <[email protected]> wrote: From: Ed Fyffe <[email protected]> Subject: Hidden History of Corporations To: [email protected], [email protected], "Arlene Johnson" <[email protected]>, "Buddy Pastor" <[email protected]>, "Charlene Layne" <[email protected]>, "Charlene Layne" <[email protected]>, "George Cozby" <[email protected]>, "hal" <[email protected]>, "Jim Cox" <[email protected]>, "Leon Bard" <[email protected]>, "Meredith" <[email protected]>, "Pastor Dan" <[email protected]>, "Rod Class" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 6:12 PM This gives a foundation upon which we may be able to help push the many corporations in this country over the cliff to destruction.
