Bob~
You call these “changes” and I call them “charges”; reason being due to these elements under discussion’s fractile (Actually in either sense of the word) effects on my pretty well worked knowledge base of their relatings. I started to read it, then decided to scansion it for it pretty soon started making large swells of information wash in my lately beleaguered head! I finished it tonight and am amazed at the number of good matches and as well disappoints at the goodly array of uncertainty left. Obviously the conclusions we have come to in the past as to the gaposis array and black holes available in the last three significant documents of the 18th century are adequately briefed in the material but to me there were significant references to the powers of/in New York (Without specific mention of the head of European Royalty or head of finances) which rang bells but for me only dimly. The absent mention of the Society of Columbus (Or was it Columbia?) and other euro-linked political forces, for me both confirmed as well as widened previous gaps for me! That’s sort of the way it went all the way through and as I attempt to close some of those gaps, as well as segregate much of the legalese to be correlated with the known, it will take time. Any confirmations you make on the constant historical potholes ostensibly filled by these two, please pass along as I will report any lasting dilemmas and doubts to you that you to the contrary may have reason to find comfort with. I’ll strive to turn what often has appeared to me to be mere “charges” into change of paradigm/perception of facts! If little else, this piece will serve to show two things you and I well know about the language shifts over just the past two hundred years; the common thread and meanings has shifted in direct proportion of increase to the passing and shifting times in America, and the contortions and convolutions attributable to liawyers is horrendous to say the least! ~Hal~ --- On Thu, 10/15/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Missing Constitutional History you should know about... To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 10:29 PM To All: The attachment hereto is a communication I just received today. It is absolutely mind-blowing in its revelations. It was sent to Fred Smart, the WTP Regional Coordinator who forwarded it to me. This James Madison is a "direct descendant" of the Father of the Constitution. The communication is between him and a friend out West. It fills a niche in Constitutional History that has been missing at least to me and I am certainly grateful to learn of its existence. I knew that the purpose of the War of 1812 was to destroy documents of the formation of the original government, but did not know of the extent that this transpired. In the commentary attached you will learn how the original document was altered for the benefit of the European Establishment in the 1840's and that the document on display as the "Original" is not the "Original" but a document written in a different style from the "Original." Any student of the Constitution will want to understand the implications of these changes. Bob Jungles
