When these announcements are sent out it would also be helpful if we all could log in account suspended does not bode well for attempted listing,Frustrated
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Eileen <[email protected]> wrote: > Even if you don't know what this is about, please tune in on Sunday, it > is very important to our nation's future. > > Eileen > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Eileen <[email protected]> > *To:* Eileen <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, January 29, 2010 4:41 PM > *Subject:* Fw: THE MOST IMPORTANT EMAIL I’VE EVER SENT…THE FINAL REMEDY > > > > *From:* SamKennedy .. <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, January 29, 2010 11:22 AM > *Subject:* THE MOST IMPORTANT EMAIL I’VE EVER SENT…THE FINAL REMEDY > > _________________________ > > > Please do NOT reply to THIS email account!!!!! - IT IS TEMPORARY AND NOT > MONITORED. Do NOT add this address to your list. Any questions sent to > this box are LOST FOREVER. For questions, please send your email to > [email protected] > > __________________________ > > > To my friends, fellow patriots and lovers of freedom worldwide, > > Some time ago I promised a final remedy to enslavement at the hands of > corporations posing as legitimate government. Well, the time has finally > arrived. This is the most important email I have ever written and it > represents an end, once and for all, at the source, to the swat teams, > arrests, foreclosures, garnishments, seizures, tax prosecutions and > hardships which result from failing to pray to corporate institutions or > exhibit evidence of subject-class citizenship. > > This Sunday night at 8 PM on TAKE NO PRISONERS (Republic Broadcasting > Network), I will be joined by the leaders of the freedom movement for the > high honor of bringing you – without commercial interruption - an end to > economic warfare and political terror by March 31, 2010. In two months, we > can, and will, be free, with your assistance. > > The Restore America Plan is not a patriot scheme. IT WAS PROPOSED TO US BY > THE MILITARY MORE THAN A YEAR AGO. Having developed the necessary tools, we > are now ready to execute the plan beginning Sunday night. > > If you truly desire to restore the posterity and end your problems once and > for all, I invite you to tune in Sunday Night, and more importantly, to > contact every one on your freedom email list. Sunday night we begin the > methodical process of reinhabiting the original de jure institutions (which > never ceased to exist) of the free American republics quickly, quietly, > efficiently and peacefully, and without the need for re-educating the > unconscious public or loud proclamations that are sure to evoke resistance > and violence. > > Very simply, the Restore America Plan will reverse the wicked deeds of 1933 > and 1865 BEHIND THE SCENES, with the same cleverness the bankers used to > remove money, law and dignity, and without disturbing the peace. We, the > sovereign People, will be in charge as the ONE AND ONLY LAWFUL AUTHORITY ON > THE LAND. Not just in name, but in reality. > > Even if the plan had not been proposed by the military, the very nature of > re-inhabiting the lawful de jure institutions of government is itself the > victory we have all been seeking. Actors throughout the United States > Federal Corporation understand they must ultimately defer to the de jure > authority on the land when properly assembled and credentialed in sufficient > number. > > And so does the military –which is why they made the offer. The > responsibility is enormous – and so are the risks if we fail. THE MILITARY > HAS CHARGED US WITH THE HIGH RESPONSIBILITY OF ENDING THE SPIRAL TO WORLD > WAR III being orchestrated by the Rulers of Evil. Never have men borne such > responsibility. We are the last best hope for mankind. Essentially, we > have been asked to provide the military with an alternative to a corporate > CEO as their commander, and to re-inhabit all the de jure institutions that > have been pre-empted from governance. > > And…we…will. Folks, it is time to step-up to the plate. It is time to be > part of the solution instead of the list of perpetual victims. Your future > and the future of your children are in YOUR hands. A line has been drawn in > the sand. If we fail to come together and accept responsibility, there will > be no one else to blame. There will be no more excuses. The future IS ours > to create. Either we seize the brass ring or slink away into obscurity. > > > That is what we are bringing you Sunday night on TAKE NO PRISONERS at 8 PM > Eastern time. No less than a moment of epochal importance in the history of > mankind. That is why the network so graciously dropped commercial > messages. All of the details and materials have been planned, worked-out > and implemented from first presentation to enforcement. We are ready to > close the deal. I hope you will join me and my very special guests for this > live commercial-free broadcast. > > TAKE NO PRISONERS is carried live every Sunday night at 8 PM EST on FM > stations around the nation, on Shoutcast (using the free Shoutcast > application on iPhones and other handhelds), and live on the internet at: > > http://republicbroadcasting.org/ > > Wishing you a blessed day and tomorrow. > > Sam Kennedy > > > Host: TAKE NO PRISONERS > Republic Broadcasting network > http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/ > The Save America Crusade > FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE. > PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED. > > ______________ > > > The following are available at: > > [email protected] > > - COLLECTING IN BANKRUPTCY SEMINAR for enforcing payment. Essential > information for anyone considering entering that forum. > > - ATTORNEY REPELLANT PACKAGE to predictably avert civil suit or threat by > making it impossible for counsel to file the lawsuit. > > - ROCKLAND SEMINAR – the landmark workshop where comprehensive > administrative process was introduced including all the bells and whistles > such as self executing powers of attorney and confession of judgment... > > - CONTRACT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PACKAGE > > ______________ > > (Dr.) Sam Kennedy > Host: TAKE NO PRISONERS > Republic Broadcasting network > http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/ > The Save America Crusade > FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE. > PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED. > __________________________ > > * To be removed from this email list, please contact “ > [email protected]” from the address you wish removed. > * PLEASE NOTE: The email address from where these weekly emails are sent is > not monitored. Questions sent to that address are lost forever. > _________________ > > HORSE’S MOUTH CONFESSIONS > (can be reviewed in less than 30 minutes). > Please Goggle or use the included links: > > - “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal corporation > never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15) ( > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html > ) > > - “27 CFR 72.11” (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of > the fall of the republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and > the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with > the de facto corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the > United States was replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT > COURT (http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html) > > - “Executive Order 6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s gold > and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the > Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law > enforcement was duped into enforcing against the general public a command > that only applied to Federal employees and members of the armed forces.) ( > http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611 or > http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html) > > - “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a > felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging” debts) ( > http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm or > http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html) > > - “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of the > Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason by the > chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In scathing > speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and ruined > the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has > practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on > banking also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal > Reserve to pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of > today’s “tax remedies.”) ( > http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html or > http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html and > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden) > > - “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: > “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for > purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, > privately owned and locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v United > States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no > United States immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in > name only. (http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htmand > http://www.geocities.com/chrisforliberty/lewis.html) > > - “Modern Money Mechanics” (The Fed’s concise operational manual showing > how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air by the Fed and > it’s member banks. The manual is very clear as to the power of created > inflation to speed the process of confiscating your wealth. The section: > “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in “Bank Deposits – How They > Expand or Contract” are worth extra attention.) ( > www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf or > http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Modern_Money_Mechanics/Introduction ) > > - “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go to the > Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the banking > families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With two-thirds of > everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of > what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by > Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all > individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the > services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, > Cover letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12, > 1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and the > Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of > Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.) ( > http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html or > http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm) > > - “31 CFR 103.11” (Promissory note is defined as a “monetary instrument:” > “(u) Monetary instruments…Monetary instruments include…All negotiable > instruments (including personal checks, business checks, official bank > checks, cashier's checks, third-party checks, promissory notes (as that term > is defined in the Uniform Commercial Code), and money orders) that are > either in bearer form, endorsed without restriction, made out to a > fictitious payee (for the purposes of Sec. 103.23), or otherwise in such > form that title thereto passes upon delivery.”) ( > http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/julqtr/31cfr103.11.htm or > http://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/regulations/31CFR103.htm > ) > > - “NYUCC 3-104” (Promissory note is defined as a “negotiable instrument:” > “(1) Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within this Article must (a) > be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b) contain an unconditional promise > or order to pay a sum certain in money and no other promise, order, > obligation or power given by the maker or drawer except as authorized by > this Article; and (c) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be > payable to order or to bearer. (2) A writing which complies with the > requirements of this section is (a) a "draft" ("bill of exchange") if it is > an order; (b) a "check" if it is a draft drawn on a bank and payable on > demand; (c) a "certificate of deposit" if it is an acknowledgment by a > bank of receipt of money with an engagement to repay it; (d) a "note" if > it is a promise other than a certificate of deposit.) ( > www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html) > > - “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under dictatorial > control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special Committee on the > Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report 93-549, War and > Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973. “Foreward: Since March 9, 1933, > the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…These > proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of > statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily > exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a > host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, > confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal > Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the > President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; > seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; > seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the > operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of > particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”) ( > http://www.scratchinpost.net/barefootbob/war_ep1.html) > > - “Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949).” (U.S. > regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of > Columbia. “It is a well established principle of law that all federal > regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United > States unless a contrary intent appears.”) > > - “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only within > the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “The laws of Congress in > respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] do > not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in > the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive > jurisdiction of the national government.”) > > - “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only > within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a canon > of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary > intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within the territorial > jurisdiction of the United States.”) > > - “Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if the > constitution applies to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed the great > fraud of unlimited statutory power misapplied throughout the continental > united States of America. Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. > “…two national governments, one to be maintained under the Constitution, > with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside > and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other > nations of the earth are accustomed to…a radical and mischievous change in > our system of government will result…We will, in that event, pass from the > era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written > constitution into an era of legislative absolutism…It will be an evil day > for American liberty if the theory of a government outside the supreme law > of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.” In other > words, a genuine de jure united States of America congress is always bound > to enact laws within the jurisdiction of the constitution. He held tyo the > obvious truth that congress does not exist, let alone have powers, outside > the constitution. Harlan said, "This nation is under the control of a > written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the only source of the > powers which our government, or any branch or officer of it, may exert at > any time or at any place.") > > - Section 802, Patriot Act. (Defining the People as terrorists. Defining > terrorism as a maritime event. Excluding private meetings on the land from > terrorism: “(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--(A) > involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal > laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended-- (i) > to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy > of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct > of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) > occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”) > (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Section802.html) > > _________________ > > > INDEX TO RECENT TOPICS (2008 mostly) - TAKE NO PRISONERS > > - Repelling attorneys (July 6, 2008, July 13, 2008, Aug. 17, 2008, Oct. > 12, 2008) > - Contract disputes – settling (Jan 13, 2008, Jan. 20, 2008, Feb. 24, 2008) > - Rescinding testimony – grand jury or other (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Return of process letter (Nov. 9, 2008) > - Returning process – 3 methods without entering the Bar (Nov. 9, 2008) > - Returning process orally by tribal attorney (Nov. 9, 2008) > - Returning process orally with prayer outside the Bar (Nov. 9, 2008) > - Returning process after having appeared (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Returning subpoenas, summonses and complaints (Oct 19, 2008, Nov. 23, > 2008) > - Subpoenas - six ways to handle (Oct. 19, 2008) > - Subpoenas (Dec 8, 2007) > - Summons – handling (June 1, 2008 (part 1), June 22, 2008 (part 2)) > - Complaint – handling (June 1, 2008) > - Records - affidavit denying existence (July 13, 2008) > - Investigation – handling (Aug. 24, 2008) > - Arraignment - handling (Oct. 19, 2008, Oct. 26, 2008) > - Indictment (Dec. 16, 2007) > - Arrest – treatise on handling (August 10, 2008) > - Grand jury hearing - handling (Oct. 19, 2008) > - Court hearing – handling (Aug. 31, 2008) > - IRS hearing (July 13, 2008) > - FBI interview – handling (June 8, 2008) > - Trial – interview with Tom Schaults (Aug 24, 2008, Aug. 31, 2008) > - Appear or not? (Nov. 23, 2008) > - Rejecting dismissal of the counterclaim (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Denial of a corporation (Aug. 10, 2008) > - Deconstructing the De facto Courtroom (June 30, July 20, 2008, July 27, > 2008, Aug. 31, 2008, Sept. 7, 2008, Sept. 14, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008) > - Basic courtroom procedure (Sept. 7, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008) > - Courtroom procedure (June 30, July 20, 2008, July 27, 2008, Aug. 31, > 2008, Sept. 7, 2008, Sept. 14, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008) > - Making the record (Oct. 5, 2008) > - Probation – a primer (Dec. 30, 2007) > - Sentencing (Dec. 30, 2007) > - Reporting to prison (Dec. 30, 2007) > - Repelling arrest for failure to appear (Dec. 8, 2007) > - Repelling prison sentence (Dec. 8, 2007) > - Prison extraction (Nov. 10, 2007, Dec 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007) > - Names - handling the name issue (Sept. 14, 2008) > - Special sovereign victory (Jan 13, 2008, Jan 20, 2008) > > > - Basic UCC Redemption process, Part 1 (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Seals (Nov. 30, 2008, Dec. 7, 2008) > - Instant Affidavit (Oct. 5, 2008) > - Basic UCC process for zeroing and funding account (Dec. 7, 2008) > - BC Bond for funding account (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Fidelity bond – debunking the myth (Aug. 31, 2008) > - Criminal Code of Canada (Sept. .28, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008) > - Perils of drafting Treasury – a caution (Dec. 22, 2007) > > > - Enforcement (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, 2007, June 1, 2008, July 20, 2008, > Sept. .28, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008) > - Enforcement with 18 USC 2071, 75 and 76 (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Enforcment with BIC – comprehensive approach (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, > 2007) > - Enforcement (comprehensive) – with letter form the Queen (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Enforcement with liens (Apr. 13, 2008) > - Counterclaim (Nov 11, 2007) > - Arresting a bond (June 1, 2008) > - Arresting successor surety – a lien against title (Dec. 8, 2007, Dec. 9, > 2007, Dec. 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007) > - Dunn & Bradstreet (Apr. 13, 2008) > - Notary for enforcement (Sept. 2, 2007, Sept. 9, 2007, Sept. 29, 2007) > - Trial by notary (Sept. 9, 2007) > - Commercial liens (Apr. 13, 2008) > - Criminal complaints (Dec. 8, 2007), Apr. 13, 2008) > - Drowning in public policy (Feb. 24, 2008) > - Power of Attorney (self-executing) (Oct. 19, 2008) > - Bankruptcy Court, delaying foreclosure, enforcing liens (Nov. 3, 2007, > Nov. 10, 2007, Nov. 11, 2007, Feb. 24, 2008) > - Issuing subpoenas (Dec 8, 2007) > > > - BIC (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, 2007, Dec. 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007, Jan. > 6, 2008, Jan 13, 2008, Feb. 10, 2008, Feb 17, 2008, Feb. 24, 2008, May 25, > 2008, June 1, 2008, June 8, 2008, June 22, 2008, June 30, 2008, Aug. 17, > 2008, Aug. 24, 2008) > - BIC overview (Dec. 16, 2007) > - BIC and probation – a primer (Dec. 30, 2007) > - BIC safety modification (Aug.17, 2008, Aug. 24, 2008) > - BIC Turbo – Canadian version outtake (Oct. 26, 2008) > - BIC turbo v. Turbo 9 and Turbo 8.3 (June 8, 2008) > - BIC Self-executing Power of Attorney (Oct. 19, 2008) > - BIC Comprehensive Administrative Remedy (Dec. 16, 2007) > - BIC Global Privacy Shield (Oct. 12, 2008) > - BIC Fundamentals (May 25, 2008) > - BIC offset bond (Nov. 4, 2007) > - Early and other introductory BIC topics can be found in the months prior > to September 2007 not included in this list. > - Attorney Repellant Package for those facing threats of a civil lawsuit > (July 6, 2008 (Part 1), July 13, 2008 (Part 2), Aug. 17, 2008, Oct. 12, > 2008) > - Contract Dispute Settlement Package – settling (Jan 13, 2008, Jan. 20, > 2008, Feb. 24, 2008) > - BIC Rescission Package (Dec 8, 2007) > - Notary process (June 8, 2008) > - Notaries - protecting the notary (Dec. 22, 2007, March 9, 2008, Aug. 17, > 2008, Aug. 24, 2008) > - Notary under attack (Dec. 22, 2007) > - Notary as non-participant (Aug 24, 2008) > - Trial by Notary - Assembling a notary tribunal to issue and defend > subpoenas > > > - Capitalization – the actual Biblical derivation for (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Solemn affirmations v. affidavits – Biblical derivation for affirmations > (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Biblical rationale for Redemption process (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Punctuation in names (Dec. 7, 2008) > - Commercial philosophy (August 10, 2008) > - Creditor philosophy (Dec. 16, 2007, April 27, 2007) > - Mentoring (Mar. 2, 2008) > - Mentoring Corps (Mar. 2, 2008) > - Fear (Dec. 22, 2007, March 9, 2008, Aug. 10, 2008, Aug. 17, 2008) > - Safety (Aug.17, 2008, Aug. 24, 2008) > > > - HJR 192 (Nov. 23, 2008) > - Public Law 73-10 (Nov. 23, 2008) > - Public Law Statutes-at-large, 48 Chap 48, Stat. 112 (Nov. 23, 2008) > > > - Abatement (June 1, 2008, Nov. 23, 2008) > - Abatement – returning process orally with prayer outside the Bar (Nov. > 9, 2008) > > > - Tom Schaults interview (June 30, 2008, July 20, 2008, July 27, 2008, > Aug. 24, 2008, Aug. 31, 2008) > - McFadden Remedy (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Congressman Louis McFadden (Nov. 30, 2008) > - Elaine Brown – Commentary on purported use of a 1099 (August 10, 2008 > > > - Sponsoring the credit – the philosophy of tax remedies (Dec. 16, 2007, > April 27, 2008) > - OID method (Jan. 6, 2008, Jan. 13, 2008, , April 27, 2008, May 4, 2008, > May 4, 2008, May 11, 2008, May 18, 2008, June 8, 2008, Oct. 26, 2008, Nov. > 16, 2008) > - Tax remedies – conclusions of ZYA v “A” method (Nov. 16, 2008) > - ZYA (June 8, 2008, Nov. 16, 2008) > - “A” method intro (April 27, 2008) > - 1099 process - to use or not (Nov. 16, 2008) > - 1099 process - misuse of Form 1096 with likely prosecutions (Oct. 26, > 2008, Nov. 16, 2008) > - 1099 process - 6 levels of safety in court cases (Oct. 26, 2008) > > Folks, most any of those topics can be a remedy for men and women who treat > them as acorns to be researched and developed as part of a comprehensive > program of spiritual growth and learning. The list was compiled from > broadcast summaries, so my apologies for the many other topics not mentioned > in the summaries which are not included in the list, and for any errors or > typos. > > CAUTION: Please be aware of my tendency to create “technology” on the fly > as needed. Which means that some topics are seasoned and some are fresh off > the drawing board. So please be cautious in YOUR decisions, and when > handling emails that seek to use fear to suppress the free flow of > information that made all this information possible. If we had heeded the > call for quiet suffering instead of public exchange of ideas, none of these > topics would have materialized. > >
