Bob~ I will try to explain this as simply as I know how. 
 
SOCIALISM is generally based on the principle of Democracy. What that means at 
simplest is that the MAJORITY RULES! It has been transliterated as “Mobocracy”. 
Now to date NO country has ever been ruled under pure “democracy” as those who 
set it up only use the idea as a springboard to rule. The first really 
successful operation of the idea of “common” ownership controlled by a 
governing body was that accomplished by Nimrod this was around 4,000BC and 
2,000 years before Abraham (1,900 BC). This early government shared “ownership” 
scheme was taken back to Rome around 300-250BC. Democracy ain’t a new idea!
 
The notion of the “Republic” began after the flood and grew into ideals around 
the time of Abraham. It was never widespread in practice until the Exodus 
terminated in Israel and it was developed at the start by Moses. There, 
(Pentateuch) it is what we call the Rule of Tens or the Rule of Hundreds, where 
the best and brightest are picked to represent a larger and larger group 
beginning with ten Men! The slip has always been in both the interest of Men to 
participate in self governance and the “leadership” remaining honest so as to 
not falsely preclude honest elections.
 
In Democracy the rights of the people are never allowed to settle into being 
controlled  by the individual, the primary consideration always being in 
conformity to the majority of opinion relative to government operation with all 
allegiance to the Compelling State Interest.  In the Republic the emphasis 
always remains with the individual and individual rights, emphasizing 
consideration of the individuals welfare and not that of the State (i.e. 
individual in the state having predominance over the interests of the State or 
the STATE), self governance being the focus of society and society is not the  
focus of the individual.
 
In the republic the consent rests with the individual over the masses whereas 
in democracy the consent of the majority rests upon all. ~Hal~

--- On Wed, 5/5/10, Bob Gavett <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Bob Gavett <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: RE: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] RE: Clarification of word(s).
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 9:15 PM


  





Hal,  here is my scatter brain guess. . .  .  .Constitutional Convention in 
Philadelphia on September 18, 1787  and it is a democratic republic,  not “a 
democracy in a republic”. 
 Bob Gavett 


From: MYRLANDsMETHODs@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:MYRLANDsMET h...@yahoogroups 
.com] On Behalf Of hal
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 9:01 PM
To: garytr...@hotmail. com; myrlandsmethods@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: jop
Subject: Fw: RE: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] RE: Clarification of word(s).
 
  








Please be the first to be able to tell me -- and you are at the head of  very 
long line -- where and when the creation of the "United States of America, a 
democracy in a Republic; a sovereign Nation,a perfect Union, one and 
inseparable" took place? I mean the official conversion of that which was duly 
constituted on the Fourth of July, AD1776, not that Lincolnesq, reconstructed 
BS which most Americans have sucked up like poison nectar??!  I do hope you 
realize the display of "a democracy in a Republic" is a collosal oxymoron! ~Hal~

 

Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 8:42 PM


  


Bob -
 
Thanks...
 
Best Gary 


"I believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people by the 
people, for the people, whose just powers are derived from the consent of the 
governed; a democracy in a Republic; a sovereign Nation of many sovereign 
States; a perfect Union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles 
of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots 
sacrificed their lives and fortunes."
"I therefore believe it is my duty to my Country to love it; to support its 
Constitution; to obey its laws; to respect its flag, and to defend it against 
all enemies." Read in Congress April 3, 1918.





  



To: MYRLANDsMETHODs@ yahoogroups. com
From: ilbarb...@comcast. net
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:35:27 -0400
Subject: RE: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] RE: Clarification of word(s).




In the event you’ve not yet sent this, I offer the suggestions found below . 
 


From: MYRLANDsMETHODs@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:MYRLANDsMET h...@yahoogroups 
.com] On Behalf Of Gary D
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 7:53 PM
To: garytr...@hotmail. com
Subject: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] RE: Clarification of word(s).
  
  



 
May 5, 2010
 
LAUREN A. ZACCARELLI, CHAIR
PO Box 280121 
Harrisburg, PA 17128-1021 
  
RE: Clarification of constructions appearing to mimic word(s). 
  
Dear Gentle people:  Lower case “G” unless it is an actual name.  And a comma 
rather than a colon. 
  
Please accept my sincere appreciation 
Strike to review strike 
for your reviewing my request for a refund. 
  
strikeKnowingstrike 
I know that all punctuation, letter(s) and word(s) have meaning, even possibly 
multifarious. 
I  strike am instrike   need to know what the following all capital letters  
strike,strike   constructions     strikename(s), word(s), arrangement 
of words or phrasesstrike     mean (take out this period and put a colon).      
                       strikePlease address the following:strike 
  
DEAR TAXPAYER;  THE BOARD;  COMMONWEALTH;  pennsylvania;  
  
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE;  FORD, GARY D;  GARY D FORD; MOTOR 
  
VECHICLE / DRIVER; LICENSE PRODUCTS; Vehicle; and Driver. 
  
Noteworthy are  the all capitalized constructions     strike, word(s), 
punctuationstrike       has been compiled from correspondence 
from this board to me. I am without adequate understanding of them and they do 
not conform with the standards for forming words of the English language. 
Moreover I would be at a great disadvantage not to be fully informed 
of their meaning. 
  
Please provide     strikethe “Six Ws”strike        who, what, where, when, why 
and how. 
If your rules and regulations forbid such then in the alternative please accept 
this as my “Right To Know Request” .       strikeif your are unable to self 
fulfill this request.strike 
I hereby ask for time until this can be settled between the parties. 
Furthermore, I reserve   strikereservingstrike        all rights and remedies, 
including a hearing. 
  
Lastly, I do not consent      strikeobjectstrike     to being identified by   
strikefromstrike      anything other than my 
Christian Appellation: Gary-Drew (Sole property) Family Name: Ford. 
  
Thank you. 
  
Respectfully yours, 
  
  
Via: Fax 717-787-7270 
Via: USPS 
Cc: file   
 


__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic 
Messages in this topic (2) 
Recent Activity: 

Visit Your Group 

MARKETPLACE


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the 
Yahoo! Toolbar now.



Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.



Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new 
interests.
 
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use


. 

__,_._,___






      

Reply via email to