I hope by now all realize at least two things (These are not the most initial need-to-know things) of prime importance. First your note is held for but a short period, then noticed to the IRS as "Abandoned Funds/assets". They are then green lighted to post those funds in their own account and then, as posted assets, amoritize them so thay they may be "fractionally" loaned out at ten times their "booked value". Then what they "pass along" (As in Pass book) in regard your "trransaction" is just debt from their pile of accumulation without more than that now familiar "thin air" concept of "money" creation.
ALL of this is sanctioned by the Federal Reserve Bank! The Federal Reserve Bank, you must remember, controls ALL the banking in America for the "Treasury" which handles the "Federal Reserve System” and that magic word "reserve" there indicates YOU are the :”Reserve” and the source of collateral NOT the Federal Reserve Bank which only handles that 10% “Reserve” for ITS banks! That “Treasury”, by the way, is a functionary of the IMF (The IRS is an accounting firm, an international corp., owned by the IMF) working through the World Bank, which is an asset of the UN, (An international CLUB) which is an asset of the Vatican! All roads lead to Rome! CHECK IT OUT for yourself! ~Hal~ --- On Thu, 6/17/10, DeLoyd Scott <[email protected]> wrote: From: DeLoyd Scott <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] Re: Please Help Fighting Foreclosure Fraud-Past Present and Future, To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 11:20 AM Creditwrench, Lenders (so called) do not lend anything. They transfer funds from buyers account to sellers account and charge the buyer an amount equal to purchase price plus interest. How nice of them to serve us dummies and give us 30 YEARS to pay them for that service. Is that disclosed? Is that fraud? You could be an awesome advocate if you would apply the knowledge you have to fact that "LENDERS DO NOT LEND ANYTHING"!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!! DeLoyd --- On Thu, 6/17/10, creditwrench <creditwrench@ gmail.com> wrote: From: creditwrench <creditwrench@ gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] Re: Please Help Fighting Foreclosure Fraud-Past Present and Future, To: MYRLANDsMETHODs@ yahoogroups. com Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 5:26 AM jeannie_wi53 wrote: One thing I don't understand about the above conversation is that the issue of fraud isn't really being addressed. CreditWrench, you made the comment, "The only problem with calling what happens "rape" is that you cannot rape a willing soul and at the time the borrower entered into the agreement s/he was a willing soul." I can't agree with that because had the borrower known the truth of what was going on, he would not have signed it. If the fraud wasn't well hidden from us, we wouldn't have signed. Then if you think that full disclosure was not provided you your remedy is to be found in TILA, RESPA and other similar laws. These laws require full written disclosure so if you didn't get a full and complete disclosure of all the terms and conditions of the contract and what you were signing you can file a lawsuit against the lender or broker or whoever failed to comply with the law. What you think was hidden from you may or may not constitute a cause of action. To find that out you need a mortgage fraud audit. >From where I'm sitting, its no different than the government spending all >kinds of money on all kinds of things that the American people don't want or >agree with, and then saying WE have to pay that back! To that I have to say >"Bunk!" If it was illegal in the first place, the people that need to pay it >back are the ones who did the dirty deed. Same with the foreclosure scam. It was fraud perpetrated against us, and the ones who should pay are the ones who did the dirty deeds. What are the elements of fraud? That is the first thing you have to know. Then did what they did or did not do constitute fraud according to the elements of fraud. If so then file a lawsuit for the type of fraud that you became a victim of. Suppose for instance that I happen to think that the American people were defrauded in the 2008 elections because all of the facts were not made known to the people. Suppose that I allege that if the facts were made public Obama would never have been elected President therefore the American people were defrauded. Can I prove the fraud in any court of law? Probably not. __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (27) Recent Activity: Visit Your Group MARKETPLACE Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now. Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center. Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey! Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___
