> Probably not. switch_root: http://searchcode.com/codesearch/view/27570339
It seems pretty feasible coding to me and not even so terribly huge by surplus; quickly grepping musl for things such unlinkat, umount2 returns matches also. I, so to speak, *know* Busybox, and it's not what I am looking at. Hence, I will try too implement a s6-switch_root given s6* and musl and augment s6-linux-utils ad hoc, for my use. By the way: mksh statically linked against musl is slightly larger in size than with dietlibc. On the other hand (and most importantly): https://www.mirbsd.org/mksh.htm [... T]oolchain: dietlibc Fefe’s dietlibc works in mksh R34, although his opinion towards certain standards, such as caddr_t, strcasecmp(3), etc. are weird. [...] Thank you and cheers. /Roy
