Laurent Bercot <> writes:

>>Probably a dumb question, but is there a reason there is no
>>`cp` and no `mv` in `s6-portable-utils`?
>  Because reimplementing a full POSIX utility suite isn't a goal.
> There are already a lot of those you can choose from (coreutils,
> busybox, toybox, sbase+ubase, etc.)

Ah, thanks. Then I’ll have to depend on coreutils
in this case. I’m also playing with the idea of compiling
a minimal static busybox with only cp and mv included.

Written with Emacs (mu4e) on NixOS.
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.

Reply via email to