Laurent Bercot <ska-skaw...@skarnet.org> writes:
>>Probably a dumb question, but is there a reason there is no >>`cp` and no `mv` in `s6-portable-utils`? > > Because reimplementing a full POSIX utility suite isn't a goal. > There are already a lot of those you can choose from (coreutils, > busybox, toybox, sbase+ubase, etc.) Ah, thanks. Then I’ll have to depend on coreutils in this case. I’m also playing with the idea of compiling a minimal static busybox with only cp and mv included. -- Written with Emacs (mu4e) on NixOS. Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es/ May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.