On Nov 2, 2007, at 3:14 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > I do think it's a bug in Leopard. It shouldn't matter whether a > script is called from Terminal or through another script.
I agree. > The built-in echo command should accept -e, the man page says so, > and as it is an sh script it should use the built-in echo command > from sh, not /bin/ech or something. It claimed to be using the builtin (at least it wasn't disabled). > Some things that may be worth trying: use -n -e instead of -ne, use > bash or zsh instead of sh. IIRC using bash directly did work; I was in a hurry to leave and forgot to mention that. adam > > > On 11/2/07, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems > that the displayline script included in SKim does not work > on Leopard. My guess is that the echo built-in command in /bin/sh has > changed. Could someone with Leopard test this? In particular if the - > e option for backslash-escapes works in sh? Or would it make a > difference to use bash? > > Christiaan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a > browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ > skim-app-develop mailing list > skim-app-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-develop ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ skim-app-develop mailing list skim-app-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-develop