On 24 Aug 2007, at 7:21 AM, Jerry wrote: > I find that the default width of the Contents Pane is too wide, given > the default thumbnail size, which seems fine. There is wasted screen > space. I frequently reduce the size of the Contents Pane to the point > where the thumbnails are _just_ about ready to be reduced in size. > > Also, even at this narrower width, there still seems like some wasted > space, apparently due to extra space being allocated to the right of > the page numbers, as though all documents might have, say, 9,999 > pages. > > Or have I set some default somewhere and this is not a common problem? > > Jerry
Well, PDFs can indeed have more than 1000 pages, so those page number should be able to display (there was a bug report on that for a 1300+ page document). Moreover page number don't need to be numbers, they can also be roman numerals like lxxxviii. Considering that, we've tried to be as economical as possible (unlike e.g. Preview). The size of the side pane is sticky: when you change it, that should stick for newly opened files later on, also between launches. One caveat is that this only works for one of the documents, usually the first one that was opened (it would give a mess if all windows would compete for the preferences). Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
