>> >> To somone's comment, >> "Count me as another voice wanting Skim integration. A question >> regarding this ? would/could quicklook provide the bridge for this? >> If skim files are 'quicklookable' (I think this is planned) couldn't >> DT use the quicklook image of Skimmed PDFs?" >> > > The question is: use for what? QL cannot provide Skim integration for > PDFs, as those are handled by the system (and QL allows only a single > plugin for each file type). There is already QL support for .skim > files and .pdfd bundles.
Can't one override the system plugins? This guy has done it for folders and zip files: http://d.hatena.ne.jp/t_trace/20071124/p3 A Skim QL plugin to override the system pdf could behave as follows: - if there are no annotations, just display the pdf - if there are embedded annotations, display the pdf with the annotations - if there's a skim file in the same location (i.e. under the same conditions where skim asks if you want to load the external notes), display the pdf with annotations On the other from that thread in the DT forums it looks like the DT devs. are just obfuscating. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
