On 4 Apr 2009, at 4:49 AM, Itsme (Sophie) wrote: > From: "Christiaan Hofman" <[email protected]> >> Have you tried Zoom To Fit? You can't zoom /both/ horizontally and >> vertically, it's either-or. > > Zoom to fit uses the width, not the height. So I lose content at the > bottom > of the pages (on my screen). >
It uses the width for continuous scrolling mode and the height for single-page mode. > Might it make sense to offer either: > (a) a smart-zoom-to-fit: so no content is lost at both top/bottom > and on > sides. It can have unused-space on either top/bottom or left/right > depending > on page and screen aspect ratio. In continuous scrolling mode you will always loose contents, because there's no single page displayed. So the current behavior makes sense. > if (page/2-page aspect ratio >= screen aspect ratio) > then zoom-to-fit-width > else zoom-to-fit-height > > or > The logic is different, and more sensible. 1/2 page display is not relevant, continuous/non-continuous scrolling is sensible. > (b) separate zoom-to-fit-height and zoom-to-fit-width, so user can > choose. There will not be yet another zoom function. > Also, it would be nice if the zoom was re-calculated when switching > in and > out of full-screen mode. > > Thanks! That can be done using Automatically Resize function. Explicit zoom functions are one-shot, and it makes no sense for them to be anything else. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
