On 04/28/2012 09:39 PM, John Clizbe wrote: > 1.1.1? If doing an update, why not go to 1.1.3, rather than add a patch or two > to 1.1.1? > > 1.1.1 also has the broken HTML generation in it which was fixed for 1.1.2.
I understand there are several changes worth importing, and i agree that
the right long-term thing for debian testing and unstable is to move to
1.1.3; However, i'm not the sks maintainer within debian, and i don't
have the time to learn enough to sort out the full upgrade right now, or
to responsibly commit to becoming the sks maintainer.
I NMU'ed this specific change because it seemed like it was blocking
people's transition to a reverse-proxy setup and it was clearly not
going to break anything else.
Sorry i haven't done more,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
