On 2012-07-31 00:32, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I think his analysis is correct, although: > > 0) i don't have a patch to propose, and > > 1) i'm not sure how to deploy such a fix across the whole keyserver > network, since it looks to me like it would effectively appear as a > "filter" change. > > any thoughts on how to address this?
Hi Daniel, If you don't mind, please open a ticket at [0]. If it indeed is in error, it might not be necessary with a filter change, it might be something that can be fixed in the cleaning of keys, which is a less intrusive change (removing the signature at all). But if you open a ticket we can discuss it. (It has been a while since I read the specs, so I will have to re-read a bit at least.) [0] https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/issues/new -- ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand http://www.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk ---------------------------- Corruptissima re publica plurimæ leges The greater the degeneration of the republic, the more of its laws ---------------------------- This email was digitally signed using the OpenPGP standard. If you want to read more about this The book: Sending Emails - The Safe Way: An introduction to OpenPGP security is now available in both Amazon Kindle and Paperback format at http://www.amazon.com/dp/B006RSG1S4/ ---------------------------- Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at http://www.sumptuouscapital.com/pgp/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
