Am Mittwoch, den 18.09.2013, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Johan van Selst: > ClarusComms OpenPGP Services wrote: > > I fully support Daniel's position as described in his last post > > +1
After following this thread, I've slightly changed my view and also think privacy should be kept whereever possible. Hiding the keys wouldn't trim them from the pool, the dump would remain complete and is free for inspection. Would it be a good idea to add dkg's patches to my keyserver (currently in the pool), or should the spectrum of answers across the pool kept predictable identical? Only keys which shouldn't be queried either, would be affected by the patch, so I can't see any disadvantages of that experiment. Oh, technically, the patches showed me that I'll never grow into an ocaml developer, I'm even unable to abstract if it works as proposed... So I need to rely on your expertise if it's wise to get them live. cheers, - Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
