On 06/11/2014 03:36 AM, Benny Baumann wrote: > Am 11.06.2014 06:41, schrieb John Zaitseff: >> Hi, Gabor, > >>>> Another small note: the directory should be /var/backups/sks (plural >>>> "backups", not singular "backup") for consistency with the FHS. >>> >>> It is my typo. Script uses correct path. > >> Not on my machine it didn't! :-) Version 1.1.5-1, postinst line 94 and >> postrm line 5. > >> By the way, I think the contents of /var/lib/sks/www should be >> conffiles, too... > Seconded. > > Also the backups should be cleaned up if not within the third most > recent ones nor done today.
I really appreciate all the suggestions. I would be very happy to see them made on the debian BTS too. In fact, several of them are there already: https://bugs.debian.org/sks that will help the package maintainers (who are all busy with many things, not only the sks package maintenance) keep track of what the outstanding needed changes are. Changes to the packaging need to take into account not only how they work going forward, but also how they effect existing installations, including those people upgrading from previous stable versions. Any contributed patches to the reports in the debian BTS would be very much appreciated too! Regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
