Arnold wrote: > So Johan, do you mean "let's do nothing, as this single one proposal > does not protect us from *all* evil"? Or do you mean "we have to > implement the proposal and think about how we can mitigate other > attack vectors to the SKS-network", like the one you mentioned?
I believe the SKS-network really needs some hardening. There are many trivial attacks or 'vandalisms' which are currently possible that might be mitigated. We should think about how to improve control and long-term maintainability of the public PGP databases. Regards, Johan
pgpkQhcj18AWV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
