-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/01/2015 04:19 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > Has anyone performed a survey of sks servers to see how well > connected we are? How fragile is the network under failure > conditions? Do we rely too much on a small number of links? >
If you have a good eye-sight (or a zoom button), you see one such graphical display e.g. on [0] that is generated based on .dot files I produce out of the network mesh recorded. Although I look at them manually from time to time, no proper statistical analysis or review has been performed on this information. References: [0] https://sks-keyservers.net/files/2014-09_NUUG.pdf - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- "Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." (Aaron Levenstein) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5bT9AAoJECULev7WN52FMxsIALvhYfMmUbYNoxrHi9NF3/M8 I/Zd9HWQkQSVIy8f8FRgiQnAfoSpYhnH7WYPGIBwlezCzQqQu7g/priEMhtAR7gA 5+RHG+PybgsWXCokWzlo1/mxo7a1ePpGB30CVT697qQBVe8PRF1BQJsD9pgjOmul p9ZrNxnC3W4nI5RsXvhJDPFVgMWPCdBGliaaNZZ6JDlPlf67eDWRmL1FwKGSeG8D TZKagoq4VutJiq0SbOro09Rtt+cZBcYy4tXCpz+IE3ntkhhtejM9aVhb03KLUu5g ptcP2p9kN5ZSRHyHp0/xPmHAUTxkyZSiilgc17BKBiqVijZ8RQq73CL45n67F3U= =to5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
