On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/27/2016 09:42 AM, Pete Stephenson wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 04/27/2016 06:45 AM, Gabor Kiss wrote: >>>> Does IPv6 address also changes? If not you may own the the "First >>>> IPv6 Only Key Server". It's a challenge for Kristian too. :-) >>> >>> We've had those before, but it is explicitly restricted in the pool >> >> Restricted in what way? >> >> Do you mean that IPv6-only servers are specifically limited to the >> ipv6 pool, or that they're flatly prohibited from membership in any >> pool? > > The latter
Out of curiosity, why? I would think that IPv6-only hosts could be limited to the IPv6 pool, and thus not cause any issues to IPv4-only or dual-stack users. I know several VPS hosting companies that charge extra for IPv4 addresses (or, on occasion, charge less if one opts not to get an IPv4 address), so having a system with IPv6-only connectivity may potentially become more of a thing going forward. Cheers! -Pete -- Pete Stephenson _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
