On 11/01/2017 12:49 am, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > Now, what would the general feeling be on this? Do we expect > privately-run SKS servers to have a four-nines, five-nines or such > uptime? > > Thanks for sharing your thoughts. >
My own view is that if a peer goes down (announced or not) for just a few days I'll just ignore it, as Phill Pennock states the reconciliation service will just deal with it and I've got better things to do than remove / replace peers when they're down. If the downtime is extended I might email the keyserver admin, but when this happens I'm sometimes surprised at the response I get 'is it? Thanks for letting me know'. Everybody opens a browser at least once a day (correct me if I'm wrong), so it wouldn't take a minute to browse to (for example) https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ks-status.php?server=sks.lockmail.net to check its status. I don't expect any keyserver to have 100% uptime, the best datacentres in the world can't achieve this. Just my thoughts
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
