Wait, you have the skillset to code attacks and spew articles yet, no 
capability for solutions? Smells like ignorance is your forte.

You seem to be under the impression that SKS has active developers working on 
it, the reason the “dev team” is quiet as per your “articles” is there is no 
friggin dev team, just some maintainers pushing merge requests from people 
hacking it a bit here and there to fix major problems that can be fixed and 
keep it compiling on modern systems.

There is nobody actively interested in the development required to 
re-archectect the SKS backend and infrastructure that had been running fine for 
a few decades now.. until you came along and made a big stink.. If you have a 
proposal for a new way of doing things, we’re all dying to hear it.

-Ryan


> On Nov 15, 2018, at 6:01 PM, Mike <st...@yakamo.org> wrote:
> 
> If i had the skill set needed to submit patches i would, but i don't.
> But i do have a voice and that can be used to spur on change.
> 
> I wrote the articles because there is a clear ignorance here that your 
> displaying really well, which is preventing things from getting fixed. Your 
> clearly angry and not interested in resolving this issue through discussion. 
> That ignorance is going to harm admins as Moritz Wirth and Fabian points out.
> 
> Can you say there's no risk to admins financially and legally, because of the 
> poor design of the servers or do they work just fine and they have nothing to 
> worry about?
> 
> If performing as designed means: 
> failing to deal with oversized keys and chewing up bandwidth and CPU cycles 
> and causing servers to stop responding or the web interface to freeze or spit 
> out garbage is a feature then ok.
> or network instability then ok.
> 
> Mike :)
> 
> and if calling people children and being generally insulting is your thing 
> your not really being constructive with this!
> 
> 
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:45:06 +0800
> Matthew Walster <dotwaf...@gmail.com <mailto:dotwaf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, 08:36 Mike <st...@yakamo.org wrote:
>> 
>>> Your welcome to blame others for the servers issues.
>>> 
>>> I and others have pointed out many times over the issues and no one has
>>> fixed them.
>>> Rather than blame me, take responsibility for the servers failings, for
>>> the developers failings.
>>> 
>> 
>> You are more than welcome to submit patches (or even ideas for patches) if
>> you want to help improve things. Screaming blue murder helps no-one.
>> 
>> Decent and good developers take bugs and fix them and ensure the ongoing
>>> survival of their software, not blame them on the people who found them and
>>> exposed them!
>>> 
>> 
>> The software is not broken. It is performing as designed. The same
>> side-effects are present in Bitcoin but I don't see you making deranged
>> comments about that...
>> 
>> Your basicly saying we should be able to have weak software and bad people
>>> shouldnt do bad things, thats not how the world works. Take some
>>> responsibility!!!
>>> 
>> 
>> That's not what anyone is saying. What are you, 12 years old?
>> 
>> And im not a journalist!
>>> 
>> 
>> You wrote an article.
>> 
>> M
>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> me <st...@yakamo.org <mailto:st...@yakamo.org>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sks-devel mailing list
> Sks-devel@nongnu.org <mailto:Sks-devel@nongnu.org>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel>
_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

Reply via email to