Todd Fleisher wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2020, at 10:29, brent s. <b...@square-r00t.net> wrote: > > > >> What benefits do you have as an SKS operator, to still support such > >> old and dangerous GnuPG/SKS client-server model, in 2020? > > > > Are you on this list just to troll or do you have anything useful to say? > > So much this. Some of us have a legitimate need for what SKS provides that > can’t be accommodated by the new kids on the block like Hagrid & Mailvelope. > Neither supports third party signatures and the web of trust. I’ve reached > out to the Hagrid team about that & peering but People also seem to still be > actively using SKS for new & updated keys as well, based on the stats page.
I have talked last year with the Mailvelope guys about other things, but they are very friendly. And I like to point out that Mailvelope keeps your Signatures and is probably the most secure key server as of today. The only thing missing AFAIK is the peering capabilities that SKS has, but I could imagine if you guys would show your support to the Mailvelope keyserver, the developemnt team would listen. At least worth a try. Regards Stefan -- Signal (Desktop) +4915172173279 https://keybase.io/stefan_claas
