John,

I didn't try 2.76 and should have mentioned that I use V3, sorry about 
that. I actually logged issue 0000136 for some search peculiarities in 
V3 which Patrick resolved. I was playing with this a little last night, 
leaving out parts of the search string etc. but ran into issue 180, CdC 
exits when it doesn't find what you're looking for twice in a row.

I'll have to experiment a little more and otherwise crank up 2.76 again.

    Sander

John Mahony wrote:
>
> Using v2.76 I found it by clicking seach>find>stars tab (or binocular
> icon>stars tab), select "TYC2" catalog, then enter 1350 00083 1 in the 
> search
> box (it doesn't work if you leave in the dashes, or the "TYC2" in the ID).
>
> -John
>
> --- Sander Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:sander%40tungstentech.com>> wrote:
>
> >
> > I created my own catalog with winoccult data (see
> >
> <http://www.tungstentech.com/Articles/Astronomy/WinOccultdatabaseforCartesduCiel/tabid/54/Default.aspx
>  
> <http://www.tungstentech.com/Articles/Astronomy/WinOccultdatabaseforCartesduCiel/tabid/54/Default.aspx>>
> >
> > for details). The catgen project includes a search index. One of the
> > stars is TYC2 1350-00083-1, the subject of an occultation tonight.
> > Because the catalog is called 'occu' the labels on the charts look like
> > 'occu TYC2 1350-00083-1'. When I enter this identifier in the search 
> box
> > the star is not found. I confirmed that the star is listed in the raw
> > text file as 'TYC2 1350-00083-1'.
> >
> > What do I enter to find this star? Picking an arbitrary displayed star,
> > copying the name and pasting in the search box doesn't result in a 
> found
> > star either. In fact the second time I tried this CdC exited quietly
> > (gdb said the program exited normally).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sander
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Cheap talk?
> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
> http://voice.yahoo.com <http://voice.yahoo.com>
>
>  

Reply via email to