2018-02-02 1:32 GMT+01:00 B Watson <yalh...@gmail.com>:
> On 1/20/18, Matteo Bernardini <matteo.bernard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2018-01-20 14:35 GMT+01:00 Heinz Wiesinger <ppr...@liwjatan.at>:
>>> audio/ardour
>> if noone else wants them badly for whatever reason I'll get those as
>> most of them are optional dependencies of audacity and I also always
>> wanted to play with ardour!
> Matteo, I don't want to maintain ardour, but would you accept a patch from
> me?
> For years I've been seeing error messages from ardour that advise me to
> edit PAM-related files that just don't exist on Slackware. If I patch
> all these error/warning messages so they make sense for us (tell the
> user to edit a file that actually exists, or whatever's required),
> would you add that to the build?
> Also, at one time, for ardour 3, I had a patch that allowed it to run
> with elevated capabilities (using filesystem cap bits), the way JACK
> applications are supposed to, without having to wrap it in set_rlimits.

np, just send me the patches.

>>> audio/jack-audio-connection-kit
> I have some ideas for audio/jack-audio-connection-kit also. Are you
> dead-set on taking this one, or can I have it? (If you look in the repo,
> you'll see I maintain a lot of audio stuff that depends on it...)

np at all for that too, just submit an update in your branch with your

SlackBuilds-users mailing list
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Reply via email to