On 2026-05-04 10:56, B. Watson wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2026, [email protected] wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions and explanations.
However, I don’t appreciate the lecturing tone. I already said I’ll
apply the
requested patch before handing over the package, and I’ve now done
that.
I understand how software conflicts are found, so the extra commentary
was unnecessary.
Sorry, didn't intend to lecture or sound condescending.
I'm writing for everyone on the mailing list. You might already know
everything I say, but others reading this might not. The idea is
that folks might read it and learn something.
Also, when I was writing the email, I didn't know you had (or were in
the process of) already sent a patch. I was trying to suggest useful
ways to patch it.
Please accept my sincere apologies for misunderstanding that part of
your reply.
I appreciate the clarification. I think I misread the intent behind your
message, especially given the mailing list context.
To avoid further confusion or unnecessary friction, I’m going to
unsubscribe from the list for now.
Best regards,
Dimitar
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
