Last I checked, the plan was to phase out XML-RPC in favour of plain old HTTP.

~ Marv.

Joshy Squashy wrote:
Hello,

I do some work that interfaces virtual objects in a second life environment with external systems (or even just custom SL viewers). I typically interact with those objects through the fairly-crippled XML-RPC interface, where objects are "stunned" for several seconds after processing a single xml-rpc event, objects can't "call out" to external systems, and objects must communicate in short messages. With the Mono update, I was hoping for the capacity to use mono frameworks (specifically Sockets) in the virtual object's mono code, but upon using the RC viewer I can't find any language differences or enhancements.

I think its fair to say this conversion to Mono is very much "under the hood"; however, as scripts run so much faster I was wondering what xml-rpc limitations still exist in Mono scripts. If the answer is "all of them", I was wondering if there were plans to expand the xml-rpc interface or to use mono syntax/libraries.

~Squash Otoro

------------------------------------------------------------------------
See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the go. See Now <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to