If they offer it for free, might as well see what results it spits out. On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sheet Spotter <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone run a static code analysis tool against the viewer source? Is LL > using a static code analysis tool internally? > > > > I stumbled into a code analysis tool from Coverity that claims to identify > source code flaws through an elaborate static code analysis with a lower > "false positive" rate than similar tools. Coverity seems to offer their tool > (or their services?) free of charge to open source projects. > > http://scan.coverity.com/about.html > > > > Coverity publishes a list of open source projects that summarizes the number > of defects identified. > > > http://scan.coverity.com/report/Coverity_White_Paper-Scan_Open_Source_Report_2008.pdf > > > > Would this tool (or any other static code analysis tool) help identify any > subtle issues with the open source client? > > > > [Disclaimer: I have no direct knowledge of this tool; I simply browsed their > web site. I have no affiliation with the vendor.] > > > > > > Sheet Spotter > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
-- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
