Maybe they are taking input heart in that the developers on this list have stated that they want as little proprietary code dependencies as possible? One major dependency in the release code is kdu to which the capital expense is somewhat high. Pricing:
Ver 6.x New licensees: Non commercial: $ 250 Commercial 25: upto 25 employees/cctors.$ 12,000 Commercial 100 : upto 100 employees/cctors $ 16,000 Commercial 250 : upto 250 employees/cctors $ 32,000 Commercial Enterprise: unlimited employees/cctors $ 48,000 Library licenses: $ 250 --------------------------------------------------------- Ver 6.x Upgrades:(from previous versions) Non commercial including Library. Sent automatically $ 0 Commercial v5.x (any) to Commercial 25: $ 1,000 Multi-user non-commercial v5.x to Commercial 25: $ 10,900 Commercial v5.x (any) to Commercial 100: $ 5,000 Multi-user non-commercial v5.x to Commercial 100: $ 14,900 Commercial v5.x (for >100 employees) to Commercial 250:$ 10,000 Commercial v5.x (other) to Commercial 250: $ 21,000 Multi-user non-commercial v5.x to Commercial 250: $ 19,900 Commercial v5.x (for >100 employees) to commercial Enterprise: $ 26,000 Commercial v5.x (other) to Commercial Enterprise: $37,000 This, of course, is assuming that they're not using the speed pack versions.. I think that to improve the state of openjpeg instead of purchasing an upgrade would both reduce proprietary dependencies and reduce capital expenditures in the long run at the same time. As for venue, I guess the people who issued the contest there either didn't know there was a group of developers on this list working on it or didn't feel that the pool was large enough. my 2c Teravus On 3/15/09, Vector Hastings <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm guessing the motive is to make money. You only lose rights to your > algorithm if you win money... so that would be your compensation. How > they'll make money is their business. If they sell it to LL, then it may > become part of an OpenSource project, in which case I'm just guessing that > they want absolute rights in order to distribute it for free. > > > Gold might not be so bad, what would bother me if I was in your shoes would > be losing rights for the second prize purse. :-\ > > You have my sympathy for the intellectual property angst involved. > > good luck, > > Vector > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Callum Lerwick > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:16 PM > To: sldev > Subject: [sldev] Linden Lab OpenJPEG contest on TopCoder > > > Is this for real? > > http://forums.topcoder.com/?module=Thread&threadID=634679&start=0&mc=1#10710 > 16 > http://www.topcoder.com/tc?module=MatchDetails&rd=13772 > http://forums.topcoder.com/?module=ThreadList&forumID=526417&mc=121 > > My googling and searching of mailing lists and LL blogs reveals no > mention of TopCoder at all, that I can find. Is LL really behind this? > Only other thing I can find is this: > > http://studio.topcoder.com/?module=ViewContestDetails&ct=1000525 > > I only found out about it because I have someone emailing me for tips. > This treads directly on my territory and I'm going to be very annoyed if > people are winning thousands of dollars for something I've been pouring > hundreds of man hours into over the past two years without any such > direct compensation. > > Also the rules are very concerning: > > http://www.topcoder.com/tc?module=MatchRules&rd=13772 > > "If TopCoder compensates you for your submission, then you agree to > irrevocably and unconditionally transfer and assign to TopCoder all > right, title and interest you have, may have or acquire in, such > submission" > > "You further agree that any and all works of authorship created, > authored or developed by you hereunder which TopCoder compensates you > for shall be deemed to be "works made for hire" within the meaning of > the United States Copyright Law and, as such, all rights therein > including copyright shall belong solely and exclusively to TopCoder from > the time of their creation." > > Or in short "You sign over your soul to TopCoder" which makes me > hesitant to participate, and makes me question the motives of those > behind the contest. This is very much the opposite of open > collaboration. > > So, seriously WTF? Does this all sound fair to you? Because I'm sure > feeling cheated. > > > Incidentally I recently posted some patches that give a 30-35% speedup > of the decoder: > > http://groups.google.com/group/openjpeg/browse_thread/thread/4d27b0eaeba39c8 > a > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
