On Суббота 28 марта 2009 00:04:53 Thomas Grimshaw wrote: > Dale Glass wrote: > > This one identifies itself as: (Openlife R16) 1.16.3 (84). > > I don't think so, llversionviewer.h shows build 160, which is current, > are you sure you downloaded the correct package? 3DX offers two downloads at http://3dxviewer.com/download-source-code.aspx
> Grab the newest R16.3 Series Source Code Package (.rar): > http://dl1.3dxviewer.com/Source/R16.3.rar This doesn't work at least on Linux, develop.py produces a CMake error about Ogre, as I explained in another post. The README helpfully says you have to write that one file yourself. I'm rather doubtful this is compliant with the GPL. > Grab the current R16 Series Source Code Package (.zip): > http://3dxviewer.com/media/3DXviewer R16 Series Source.zip This one does build, but it is old. If you're able to compile this one, could you explain what you did to make it work? > The viewer can login fine if the version string is set to Openlife R16 > 1.16.3.160 > > I've been maintaining a third party viewer at > http://www.virtumesh.com/remedyviewer/ which was based on build 84 with > hacks to spoof build 160 - but they have actively tried to block the > viewer by tweaking their login proxy.. Heheh, what are they changing? I'm interested in this, I'll probably make my own viewer (new version should be out soon, at last) able to log into OLG as well. > Basically ladies and gents, I believe they're currently in compliance > with the linden license (though perhaps not the ogre license), however > they do /not/ publish the source code in a prompt manner, and their > practices are very counterproductive to the open source community. I'm not so sure they're completely compliant yet. They're perhaps *mostly* compliant, but they make building .160 difficult, and based on what I heard it's probably completely intentional, and most likely not compliant with the GPL, which specifically requires sources AND the build scripts required. > I was met with anger, personal attacks and slander by openlife > affiliates when I released the viewer based on kirsten's code. Yeah, I had some issues of my own. This is probably not the best place to discuss it, but the interactions I had left a rather sour taste in my mouth.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
