So since there is no longer a list of proposed changes, see if I have this right:
If I want to offer a patch for consideration, I would put it out there with Affects Version/s: Snowglobe 1.2 and Fix Version/s: None and then it gets moved to Fix Version 1.2, 1.3, or mysterious future after it's decided when to implement it. If this is already a VWR issue, then I would create a SNOW issue to link to it with the info as above. Yes? No? Maybe so? Mike Rob Lanphier wrote: > Replying to an old email: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mike Monkowski > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > What is the process now for getting patches into Snowglobe? The > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe_Current_Cycle page hasn't > been updated since June. > > > > I've now updated the page to reflect the current release cycle, > including a new project release week of October 19 (preferably that Monday). > > As you might have guessed, we stopped using the wiki to manage the > release, and instead turned our focus toward JIRA. We have a set of > queries we run (which I've documented) which make it clear what we plan > to work on next. > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
