I have to agree, having a dialogue that's geared to everyone is all well and good but sldev is still a good tool to get a more focused point of view from developers without all the noise that you get from the wider discusion. That's not to say that not anyone can participate here, this is an open list but you generally get a different more specifically focused group here.
-Gordon On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Lilly <[email protected]> wrote: > (Sorry Rob for the previous message, I forgot to click on "reply to all") > This is too bad this forum thread is almost a joke. The only Linden posts > are to agree with the most opposed to an open source viewer & 3rd party > work. > > Nothing on the OSS community point of view. > > Le 20 oct. 09 à 19:25, Rob Lanphier a écrit : > > Hi folks, > > I'd like to make sure you all see the announcement of the upcoming 3rd > party viewer policy: > > https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/community/blog/2009/10/20/third-party-viewer-policy > > Followups need to be directed to the forum: > https://blogs.secondlife.com/thread/3731 > > ....since many people involved in crafting the new policy are not on this > mailing list, but will be monitoring that forum. > > Thanks > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > > Lilly > [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
