This sounds very reasonable, but if the as-yet-unstated reason for instituting this policy is to eliminate copybots, then providing a list of all available copybots on the wiki wouldn't be very helpful.
Mike Robert Martin wrote: > Yah Koow that you are really looking at the question backwards. > > What you should be looking at is KNOWN HOSTILE VIEWERS and any listing > should in fact list why you can't use said viewer > somewhat fictional examples > > 1 Cryolife: leaked lab/testing viewer known to have copyright breaking > features NOTE HAS HAD PERMISSION TO USE REVOKED BY AUTHOR NO LEGIT > DOWNLOAD LOCATION EXIST > 2 ShoopedLife: known griefer and copyright breaking features may be > recording logins and passwords for author > 3 NailLife: illegally modifed copy of Emerald Viewer GPL violation > breaks copyright may be recording logins and passwords for author > spoofs Emerald Client tags > > > of course any listing should be in the wiki with a Linden Labs Content > tag on it to prevent unauthorized editing > > unless you are going to provide even a "Sponsored By IBM" > build/download farm for projects to certify the clients as clean > listing the BAD viewers would be easier > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
