I'm not a committer, so this isn't a rebuke or anything, just a friendly suggestion. You might get more comments & chance of a merge via a pull request on GitHub - easier for everyone.
Rob On 21 May 2013, at 19:57, "James A. N. Stauffer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Attached fixes/improvements. > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James A. N. Stauffer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized logging. >> Comments? >> >> >> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com >> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ >> >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> (I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them if the >>> exist so I can follow protocol.) >>> >>> My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the approved >>> logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of the format >>> messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to is*Enabled(). >>> >>> It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any >>> comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that? >>> >>> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com >>> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > <0003-Fixed-minor-bugs-with-format-conversion.patch> > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
_______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
