On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:32 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > In the FAQ of SLF4J it says "As of SLF4J version 1.5.3, logger instances > survive serialization". For me this means that all SLF4J loggers are > serializable. But only the Logger implementations are Serializable "not the > interface". > Due to this my code analysis criticizes "Non-transient non-serializable > instance field in serializable class" for the logger. > So my question is why does the logger interface not extend Serializable? > From the FAQ i understand that it is part of the contract of a Logger > implementation that it is serializable. > > Is this a general comment, or do you have a problem you're trying to solve? I ask because making Logger static and final will usually, but no always, do whatever you are trying to do with Serializable even better.
_______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
