To be honest, I don't know how the Logger-Implementation intercepts SLF4J. But referring to a special logger from an application is a contradiction of the idea behind SLF4J. From my point of view there should be a programmatical opportunity to get hold of the logs. Butbthank you anyway - I will ask my question to the logback mailing list.
Am 17.06.2013 um 17:43 schrieb Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]>: > > In that case, please post your question on the logback-user mailing list. > > On 6/17/2013 5:41 PM, Ulrich wrote: >> I'm using logback. >> >> Am 17.06.2013 um 14:16 schrieb Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> Which logging framework are you using? SLF4J does not have a notion of >>> appenders... >>> >>> On 6/17/2013 2:01 PM, Ulrich wrote: >>>> Is it possible to get the filename/resource used by an appender? >>>> Ulrich >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> slf4j-user mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >>> _______________________________________________ >>> slf4j-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >> _______________________________________________ >> slf4j-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user _______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
