It depends. What do you have in mind?
On 12/26/2013 5:09 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
Hmmm, interesting point. Would you be open to the possible extension of
the existing formatter?
(*Chris*)
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Chris,
It is not possible to configure a different MessageFormatter than
the default. The current API does not and will not support changing
the MessageFormatter because allowing for such changes would open
the door for errors. For example, if your application A depends on
library L, and F1 and F2 are two formatting conventions, then if A
uses format F1 and L uses F2, then any choice of formatting
convention would cause errors either in A or in L.
Merry Christmas and happy holidays,
On 12/26/2013 6:52 AM, Chris Pratt wrote:
Ceki,
I thought I had read that with the latest SLF4j it was
possible to
configure a different MessageFormatter than the default. But,
looking
at the code, It doesn't appear possible. What would I need to
do to get
a code modification to SLF4j reviewed and possibly approved? Is
it as
simple as providing a GitHub Pull Request to you or is there
something I
would need to sign before that would be allowed? Thanks.
(*Chris*)
_________________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/__listinfo/slf4j-user
<http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user>
_________________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/__listinfo/slf4j-user
<http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user>
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
