Hi.
The ServletContext backend looked like an abandoned project, and didn't
support serialization. So I forked it and added several features, including:
- Zero-configuration: adding webapp-slf4j-logger.jar to the webapp
will enable a default logging, which includes HTTP request IP addresses
as a prefix.
- Custom format, supporting mapped diagnostic contexts.
- Support for serialization and deserialization.
You can see the result here:
http://arkanovicz.github.io/webapp-slf4j-logger/
When the J2EE container itself uses SLF4J, the warning about multiple
bindings will show up, but if the J2EE container does child-first class
loading in the webapp (which most do), everything will be fine.
I'm still curious about webbapp login common practices: the main
advantage of using the ServletContext logger is that you don't have to
worry about the physical location of the log file, which is quite handy
when you're packaging a webapp meant to be deployed on different
environments. For instance, configuring logback to log -let say- in
/WEB-INF/log/ involves setting up a JNDI selector and tweaking the J2EE
container configuration (as described in logbak manual chapter 9), which
is not always possible.
--
Claude
On 21/08/2015 17:18, Claude Brisson wrote:
Hi.
I have some questions about using slf4j in a J2EE context:
1) I see there is a ServletContext back-end here:
https://github.com/pmahoney/slf4j-servletcontext
but it doesn't seem referenced on the slf4j website, although it looks
like the only way to have the webapp rely on the container logger.
Does it mean that it's a standard behavior to ignore the container logger?
2) I read in the FAQ: "As of SLF4J version 1.5.3, logger instances
survive serialization. Thus, serialization of the host class no longer
requires any special action, even when loggers are declared as
instance variables."
Would this still be true when using the slf4j-servletcontext back-end?
Let say I want to put a logger as a session attribute. Since the
servlet context initialization may happen *after* sessions
de-serialization, I have some doubts about it...
Thanks,
Claude
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user