Kelvin Tan wrote: > I couldn't resist peeking...:)
> Why did you choose to implement your own implementation of the Adler32 algo > in Checksum.java? What about java.util.zip.Adler32? This is still the weakest part of the implementation. The reason was that I wanted to try to use the update method, so that only one byte goes into the adler checksum, instead of regenerating the entire 16 byte checksum for each new byte. -- -Torgeir -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
