> Hi JP > > sorry for the lare reply > see comments inline > > > Jean-Philippe Courson wrote: > > > > We first have to establish a road map : I think that we could first > > integrate > > user's quota into branch 1.0 and to deal with versioning and properties move > > to the structure later. > > > > Others issues are : plug quota correctly, transactions, forbid users > > to remove their node locks and deal without contentLengths. > > > > 1) Plug quota correctly : > > Ok to make ContentInterceptor abstract and for UserQuotaContentInterceptor, > > but what are you meaning by pluggable Interceptors ? > > Which is the way they should be plugged ? > > Today the interceptors can be configured in the domain.xml file > (NamespaceConfig.java:834) > UserQuotaContentInterceptor should follow the same principle.
I plan to commit the interceptor initial code ASAP, son that we can work on further improvements. The name you suggest looks good :) Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
