24.02.2002 22:28:23, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >> So, I've spent some time today to go through the commit messages of >> the past 3 months and browsing through cvsview. I've come up with a >> list of changes that I personally consider "portable" to 1.0, i.e. not >> necessarily bug-fixes in the strict sense, but also clean-up and tiny >> feature-additions. I've attached a list of the commit messages >> (without the diffs), annotated with comments about what I think should >> be done. I have applied most of the changes in that list to my local >> working copy of the 1.0 branch, and couldn't find any serious >> problems, but more testing will follow. > >Great initiative. Extremely useful work :) >+1 for the proposed changes (I didn't go through the list item by >item, but it looks reasonable, and I trust your judgement).
Okay, I've started porting some of the core changes to CVS, more will follow tomorrow. [snip] >> What would the version number of this release be? 1.1.0 (beta) or >> 1.0.17 (beta)? > >It depends on how significant we feel the changes over 1.0.16 are. >If we also add the iems mentioned above, 1.1.0 looks a good version >number. Yeah, I'll also investigate making the directory-browsing feature of the WebdavServlet more flexible: letting the user define a directory- browsing-template URL that should point to a JSP that handles the (mostly) HTML stuff. then, there'd be 3 versions of the JSP: one using just standard Java against the Slide/WebDAV API (essentially moving the HTML display code out of WebdavServlet.java), the two others using the Struts and JSTL taglib, respectively. That change would go into HEAD as well as SLIDE_1_0, since I personally think it's a feature a lot of people might want from Slide. >> [And btw, why's Slide the only Jakarta-project using >> that versioning scheme? ;o)] > >It's Apache 2 versioning number. I liked it, proposed it a while ago, >and it was accepted. Quite frankly I expected it to become used by >other projects at Apache, but it didn't happen. I don't remember if I was already involved at that time, but I find the numbering scheme a bit confusing, to be honest :P. Especially in being unclear about alpha/beta/stable status. -chris ________________________________________________________________ cmlenz at gmx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
