Jan Tisje wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I wrote some Slide Stores and now test the behavior of some clients
> using the slide webdav servlet.
> 
> Version 0.80 of DAVexplorer could not show properties.
> 
> Version 0.81 is a little bit better. Properties are shown correctly,
> but creation does not really work for me.
> 
> * Does WebDAV support nested properties? Slide doesn't. It saves them
> serialized to a String:
> <property
> name="parentprop" protected="false" namespace="DAV:" value="&amp;#10;&lt;elem
> xmlns=&quot;namespace&quot;&gt;value&lt;/elem&gt;&amp;#10;" type=""/>

The WebDAV specification (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2518.txt) has samples
with nested properties. However, there are lots of servers that don't support
nested properties.

> (the XML containing the property is generated by me)
> 
> The property is not read back correctly.
> 
> * Does a WebDAV property REQUIRE a separate namespace?

>From a syntactical standpoint, no. But if you define new properties, it is a
good idea to provide your own namespace for them.

> 
> properties using the same (DAV:) namespace, are saved, properties with
> an other namespace become a null pointer without warning. perhaps
> slide is confused by the missing encoding-attribute.
> 
> Slide client does not support specifing a namespace, DAVexp requires
> one. What is correct?

DAV Explorer handles displaying properties with the default namespace, it
just doesn't support creating properties in the default namespace.
You can, of course, use the DAV: namespace.

> 
> btw, SkunkDAV 1.0.2.4 does not show any property contents (it shows
> the names) and does not add properties. (does not send a PROPPATCH)
> 
> Both versions of DAVexp are not able to unlock.

This is a known interoperability problem. DAV Explorer does not save the
lock token, instead it does a lockdiscovery. Upon a lockdiscovery, Slide
returns a dummy token, which can not be used for unlock.

Cheers,
-Joachim

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to