FYI: Our approach on the SAM project (which incorporates Slide) was to not
distribute Tomcat, but to provide a zip file that would drop all of the
required files in the appropriate directories (eg. into common/lib as well
as /webapps/sam/). This allowed us to setup to use a Realm (A JAAS-based one
in our case) to synch up with the Slide user database and provide a 4-step
"get Tomcat, unzip, configure JAAS, add users in Domain.xml" and run install
procedure (where the JAAS step wouldn't apply to Slide 2). This was
certainly a compromise, but it helped us stay ready-to-run without dictating
a version of Tomcat.

  Jim


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Slide 2.0 Release: Tomcat bundle


> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> >
> >> I have just finished cleaning of the build file and it still creates a
> >> .war distribution. The Tomcat bundle seems to be somewhat sick to me,
> >> though. It used to work by first copying most of Tomcat to the release
> >> dir and then replacing all needed jars and conf files. I have no idea
> >> how to release anything bundled like that.
> >>
> >> I'd propose to have the beta release without the Tomcat stuff and see
> >> what people want. I can add a new task to modify an existing Tomcat in
> >> a non-destructive way.
> >>
> >> I still do not fully understand how the Tomcat release worked and
> >> especially am wondering how to set up a context so no .war is needed
> >> any more. Can someone help? I guess I will have to turn to the Tomcat
> >> mailing lists in this issue, right?
> >
> >
> > Since you plan to remove a lot of the Tomcat related wrappers, you might
>
> I would love to keep those wrappers. Do you know anyone who would take
> care of them ;)
>
> > as well remove this distribution. I think simply shipping a .war would
> > be easier, although it definitely won't have the "it's ready to run"
> > experience.
>
> Easier, yes, but as you said, the ready to run flavour would be missing.
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to do it the other way round, as I proposed
> in the other follow up: having a special Tomcat release containing Slide?
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to