> Martin Dulisch wrote: > > >>From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>To: Slide Developers Mailing List > >> > >>Are there still general things to be completed that are not > >>restricted > >>to the 2.0 release, like > >>- finishing some features already present > >>- moving things around > >>- added targets to the build scripts > >> > >>I'd propose to let them go into the HEAD before making a > >>release branch. > >> > >>Martin (Dulisch) do you plan to add any more targets to the > >>Client build > >>script? Is it in a more or less stable state in the first case? > >> > > > > > > Yes, I wanted to add a 'package' target for the release. What is the > > timeline? Sorry if I have missed it in other postings. > > We are not in a hurry, I guess. My idea is to collect all global changes > and then make the branch. I wanted to branch this week if possible or > the next if needed... > > > The state of what do you mean? > > - build script: I tested it on Mac and Windows > > - client lib with patch from Ingo: still testing it, but no problems yet > > > > I can only speak for the client lib, not command line. Should we make the > > release without the command line client? > > I thougt Mike Oliver and Ingo wanted to take care of it. So, Mike, Ingo > is the command line client ready for a release?
Right, we already agreed to include it. And I would say that it's ready for a release (knowing that we have enough time till the final release to fix bugs that might be showing up). A trifle to think about: Before separating the client part, the generated jars included the Manifest from src/etc. Do we need to use it for some legal reasons, does it need to be updated? I would at least like to see the sealed statement removed as that had bitten me for some time, because WebStart could not handle it. Ingo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
