Why not use commons-logging? Richie
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 21:48, Unico Hommes wrote: > Daniel Florey wrote: > > > > What about making the getLogger()-method in Domain.java > > public? This would > > allow classes without access to the namespace to use the > > domain logger. > > Why not use the logging methods on the Domain class itself? They're > already public. > > > A tiny patch for this is attached. I'd like to > > clean up the logging in slide some day in the future (by switching > > to jdk-logging). What do you think about it? It's not the > > most sophisticated > > task to do it, but I think it's worth to do it. > > > > I think any improvements to the logging system would be more then > welcomed here. Don't know about Java logging package, I haven't heard > much good about it. Though that is mostly hearsay. What about using > commons logging instead? > > Unico > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
