> 1) Many files under ./proposals/wvcm and proposals/jcrri have 
>    not copyright
>    message attached at all. Are they somehow special since they are
>    related to the JCP? Otherwise which year should be used for the 
>    copyright?

The sources under proposals/wvcm without copyright header are exactly the interfaces 
provided by the JSR-147 EG (javax.wvcm.*) which I checked-in temporarly. I think, once 
the standard is approved and there is an official release of the interfaces, we will 
be able to remove javax.wvcm.* from our CVS.

I agree that the stuff under proposals/wvcm is not yet ready to be released. As a 
member of the JSR-147 EG I can tell that the spec just passed its 1st public review 
but is still highly subject to changes. Currently, the implementation at 
proposals/wvcm (org.apache.wvcm.*) is compliant with the version which went out for 
public review ... I'll keep it up-to-date with what's going on at JSR-147.

Nevertheless, I would like to make some advertising for the wvcm implementation here 
:-). If somebody is looking for a WebDAV client lib ... the wvcm implementation is an 
alternative to the Slide-Client lib ... give it a try !! As the spec very much focuses 
on DeltaV and does not cover all of WebDAV, I have added some non-standard extensions 
for locking, DASL and ACL which I have proposed or will propose to the JSR-147 EG. So, 
the org.apache.wvcm.* implementation covers a lot of WebDAV right now.

Regards,
Peter 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Holz
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 20:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Licence for slide 2.0b
> 
> 
> 
> Open points at license conversion:
> 
> 1) Many files under ./proposals/wvcm and proposals/jcrri have 
> not copyright
>    message attached at all. Are they somehow special since they are
>    related to the JCP? Otherwise which year should be used for the 
>    copyright?
> 
> 2) 
> ./src/share/org/apache/slide/search/basic/expression/GenericBa
> sicExpression.java
>    had no copyright notice and strange author tag. I added a 
> copyright notice.
>    Is this okay? J�rgen?
> 
> 3) ./src/util/org/apache/util/MIME2Java.java has a additional 
> coyright message
>    related to IBM. How to handle this.
> 
> 4) Most of the non java files  including all the testcases
>  have no license attached.
> 
> 
> I think all files, which had a 1.1 license are converted 
> except MIME2Java and some files in src/webdav/client, which
> Ingo will probably delete tomorrow. 
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to