DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26913>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26913 Lack of non-transactional history counter. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-25 09:49 ------- I have checked this and am wondering why revisions are created in this way. Especially when using non-versioning aware clients like MS Office wouldn't it make more sense to put revisions to a directory analogous to the original one? E.g. /files/test/file1.txt would be versioned in /history/files/test/file1.txt instead of /history/10/h3 or similar locations. This would make it possible to actually find versioned content ever if the client has no idea about versioning. Any reasons why this should not be done this way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
