I haven't really looked at it, but I think we should go for it provided:
1) The work that still needs to be done is fairly minor 2) The potential for serious bugs is low
If this improves performance significantly, I think it's worth the effort.
-James
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks!
I have had a look at it and it seems promising and largely independent of the used database. However, it still needs some work. Should we try to add it to 2.1? Or defer it until later?
Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30442>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30442
How to make slide faster - submission
Summary: How to make slide faster - submission Product: Slide Version: 2.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Stores AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's my suggestion to make the rdbms store faster by reducing the number of times the database needs to be accessed when modifying child bindings or properties. If you have any questions let me know.
Tara
I will attempt to attach the modified files.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
