Re: proposal to move JCR RI to incubator

[Paul Russell]

Hi all,

On 5 Aug 2004, at 11:01, David Nuescheler wrote:

Hi Gianugo,
[...]

As a consequence, then, my first proposal
would be rethink the name: jcr or
jcrri aren't "product" names, and they smell
bad of "just" RI
(a quick "grep '.*j.*c.*r.*'
/usr/share/dict/words" didn't blow my mind,
the best alternative being "rejoicer".

.. or JuiCeR ;)) ?

Urgh. ;)

Count me in, I'd be glad to help out in my
Copious Free Time (urgh).

Thanks.

I hate saying 'me too', but I'm also totally behind the JCR RI being separated out, both to increase its visibility, and to emphasise that JCR is not 'just another API for slide'.

I am more than happy to help in any way I can. To me, JCR could be a fundamental part of a number of large projects, so it's extremely important that we prove the technology and build a world-class implementation as soon as practical.

Count me in.

Paul
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

smime.p7s

Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature