On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:44:36 +0200, Stefan L�tzkendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Versions are maintained at the version history resource I think. That > one of the things im bewildered again and again (:-) > If you put a resource under version control and check it in some times, > you will not found any aditional revisiondescriptor at the resource but > at the history resource. So I think (webdav) versions are NOT removed. > (Multiple revisions I have ever observerd when removing the history > resource, i.e. the collection where the versions are stored) (Thats why > think the webdav versioning and the slide versioning are designed under > different views, and something could be improved we only want to support > webdav)
Right, forgot about that... > The other point looks weired too. First locka and permissions are > removed, and than content and the node are removed. The checks in > ContentImpl.remove and StructureImpl.remove seem to be made effectless. > But why we dont observe strange security violations? I guess because inherited security setting apply here. It is just local settings that are removed. Still, seems to be just wrong to me. Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
